Speaking of surveillance, I think everyone is familiar with it.
Now the security is so good, it is indispensable to the credit of the surveillance camera.
Not only will the streets and shops install cameras, many people will also install cameras in their homes, in addition to anti-theft, but also to monitor the unexpected situation at home, it is really a double kill.
However, when a technology is used maliciously, the harm it does is also enormous.
On January 15, some netizens broke the news that it was suspected that someone used illegal means to crack the camera and upload video surveillance footage to station B for profit.
Illegal videos are often found, and the review is negligent for a while, and the deletion problem is not big.
Moreover, Station B also quickly issued a processing statement, which has removed the relevant video for the first time, and banned the account that uploaded the relevant content, and reported the account information to the competent authorities.
At the end of the article, a serious warning is also given that such acts are suspected of seriously violating personal privacy and are illegal acts.
It seems that there is nothing wrong with this treatment, and it is quite timely.
But just look at the netizen's breaking news, you will find out how outrageous Station B is!
First of all, these videos are not recently emerged, from the netizen's revelations, it can be seen that this kind of video of station B has existed for a long time.
And the number of such videos is not in the minority, from schools to hospitals and even hotels.
Look at the comments again, that's called a smoky miasma, snooping on someone else's privacy is so interesting?
If this netizen did not come forward to report, would these videos of Station B always exist?
And can these outlaws just let go of their hands and feet?
It can be predicted how bad the consequences will be once this kind of video becomes a common practice.
First of all, there must be a large number of imitation videos, because on the night of the 18th, there was an incident of male doctors live broadcasting gynecological surgery on Station B.
Although the live broadcast was quickly banned, the harm caused to the patient was not closed to make up for it.
Moreover, a large number of onlookers will also be pulled into the so-called paid group, and it is not said how outrageous the content of the peddling is.
This kind of group will generally package the cracked software directly to others, and after these people get the tools, they will unscrupulously spy on the privacy of others.
This thing spreads widely, always feel that you are being monitored, who will have a sense of security in the future!
Therefore, seeing the processing announcement of station B, in fact, many netizens are not satisfied, and station B claims to use intelligent manual review.
It's all manually reviewed, so why would such an obviously problematic video be released?
Does Station B still want to create a wave of big hot spots and create a batch of hot stems from this cracked video?
It is true that the review mechanism of Station B is problematic, but other websites can directly put out the color video, which is also more than enough.
Therefore, many sober-minded netizens also realize that the root of the problem lies in the existence of these cracked videos.
Even if a video on Station B cannot be misjudged (in fact, it is impossible), criminals can still upload these videos to other videos or live broadcast websites.
The root of the problem lies in fixing the privacy vulnerabilities of the monitoring devices and improving the user's awareness of privacy protection.
First of all, the privacy vulnerabilities of monitoring devices, which are natural, there is no perfect product, so we need to intervene and fix.
Therefore, in the choice of equipment, we need to buy products that focus on the field of security, rather than some products that claim to understand everything, but everything is not refined.
I don't know if you remember the water drop live broadcast incident that year, the camera of a domestic brand said that the product was mainly monitoring function when it was promoted.
Honestly, this camera can indeed monitor, but some users find that they appear on a live broadcast platform without their knowledge.
After verification, I learned that the original camera was also associated with its own live broadcast platform, and while monitoring, it could also open live broadcasting.
You buy this camera to monitor others, did not expect that this camera in turn can let you be "monitored" by others, you say this camera to buy what to do.
Now on the market, there are a large number of unqualified, problematic camera products, we really can't be greedy to buy.
If you really just need it, the budget is not high, you can also buy, but you must pay attention to protect your privacy in use.
The most important point is that the position of the camera must be exquisite.
Just by saying this, maybe everyone has no real feeling, we can push back from the perspective of outlaws, what kind of camera placement is the most dangerous?
According to the intelligence that the old fox scavenged in this paid group, the most dangerous location is what they call "boutique", that is, the bedroom, bedside and other directions...
How bad these people are, everyone understands it, the more they can spy on the location of privacy, which is where these people are most looking forward to.
Therefore, the camera really can't be placed in these dangerous positions.
If it is really necessary to put monitoring in the room and other places, then the best way can only be to reduce the use time.
At home or when there is no monitoring need, unplug the power supply of the camera to ensure that it is not used by unscrupulous elements.
The last point is to pay attention to the setting of passwords, because it is very simple for criminals to crack surveillance devices.
They first scan the IP to obtain a large number of IP addresses, and then import these IP addresses into the software to detect brute force cracking in batches.
And the method of cracking, just to try the password one by one, helpless hit rate can be too high!
Many friends of the device account name and password are the same weak password, such as admin / 123456 / abc / 888888 and other most common characters, using the software's own password library, one try a quasi!
Therefore, everyone really needs to change the password frequently, and it must be set more complicated, otherwise it is easy to be maliciously exploited by the wrong people.
Now although the whole network advocates the Internet of Things and the Interconnection of All Things, but if it is really connected, everything will be lucky, and the happiness of life will soar?
In fact, it is not necessarily that under the premise that user privacy is not guaranteed, immature technology is more likely to expose users to danger.