laitimes

Slow-motion restoration of the Li Chunjiang Marbury dispute, the referee's three-point approach is chilling and unfair

Slow-motion restoration of the Li Chunjiang Marbury dispute, the referee's three-point approach is chilling and unfair

In the 22nd round of the CBA regular season, the match between Shanghai Jiushi and the North Control Men's Basketball Team, a strange scene occurred, and the head coaches of the two teams scolded at the scene in front of the national fans, which also triggered the heated discussion of many fans. After several hours of fermentation, Li Chunjiang's scolding of Marbury on the field has also become the hottest topic in today's Chinese sports world, reviewing the details of this game, the referee has three unfair practices during the period, which really makes countless domestic fans feel cold.

Slow-motion restoration of the Li Chunjiang Marbury dispute, the referee's three-point approach is chilling and unfair

First of all, is the main reason for this scolding war, the players on both sides of the game as soon as the opening posture, the field is full of gunpowder, the first is Li Chunjiang because of questioning the referee's decision, and received a verbal warning from the referee on duty, but back, Shanghai foreign aid Feng Lai created a foul on the North Control players, Marbury yelled at the referee on the sidelines to question, the referee did not have any expression, the same is to express dissatisfaction with the referee's blowing penalty, the same is shouting in front of the bench, the difference is, The referee warned Li Chunjiang's righteous words, but for Marbury chose to indulge, it is precisely because of the referee's first double-standard practice that triggered a verbal dispute between Marbury and Li Chunjiang.

Slow-motion restoration of the Li Chunjiang Marbury dispute, the referee's three-point approach is chilling and unfair

The referee's second controversial blow penalty was after Li Chunjiang and Marbury scolded, in the first time of the conflict, the referee directly blew a technical foul to Li Chunjiang, while on the other side, Marbury had twisted with the assistant coach, intending to rush to Li Chunjiang to ask for an explanation, at that time there was no on-site referee to stop Marbury's behavior, until the end, it was Li Chunjiang who questioned the referee, why Marbury scolded him twice, but there was no penalty, The referee on duty re-issued Marbury's technical foul.

Slow-motion restoration of the Li Chunjiang Marbury dispute, the referee's three-point approach is chilling and unfair

The third detail of the dissatisfaction of several referees in this game is their poor control of the game, after the conflict, the three referees on the one hand are jealous of the hot-tempered Li Chunjiang, on the other hand, they are respectful to Marbury, a foreign referee, so that the two people almost have a further physical conflict after the game.

Slow-motion restoration of the Li Chunjiang Marbury dispute, the referee's three-point approach is chilling and unfair

Just think, if several referees in this game can treat both sides equally from the beginning and make the same scale of blowing penalties, then there will be no subsequent conflict farce between the latter two, just as the so-called widowhood and unevenness, as the main referee on the field, can not impartially enforce the law, treat the same problems, but make completely different blows, perhaps disrupt the order of the CBA field, not the hot players, or the coaches who do not pay attention to the rules, but the referees who act recklessly. For Yao Ming, chairman of the Basketball Association, it is time to properly control this chaos, and only by improving the professional level of law enforcers can we truly promote our league and develop to a higher level.

Read on