laitimes

Guo Tianyu's goal was invalid, did the referee expert really say this?

Just today, I saw a report about Guo Tianyu's killer goal in the match between Taishan and Yatai. According to the report, referee expert Wang Xuezhi believes that Guo Tianyu's goal foul was first, and there is a suspicion of colliding with the opposing goalkeeper, so the penalty goal should be invalidated. Because I have not paid too much attention to this expert before, I don't know whether the rumors on the Internet are Wang Xuezhi himself, if this is the case, I can only say that this expert's research on table tennis is very in place.

Guo Tianyu's goal was invalid, did the referee expert really say this?
Guo Tianyu's goal was invalid, did the referee expert really say this?

First of all, let's talk about This goal of Guo Tianyu, the game entered the stoppage time stage, Taishan team and Yatai team played a 1:1 draw, this is the Taishan team out of the penalty area, is to find Guo Tianyu this high point, the opposing defender also saw this point, and guo Tianyu jumped at the same time and grabbed the first point, but in the physical confrontation fell downwind, was knocked down by Guo Tianyu, and then Qi Tianyu grabbed the second point and dialed the ball to Guo Tianyu, who shot angrily at the ball, although the goalkeeper touched the ball, it was still difficult to stop the goal, Guo Tianyu completed the kill, The Tarzan team won 2:1 in the end.

Guo Tianyu's goal was invalid, did the referee expert really say this?

This goal can be said to be very clean and sharp, there is no problem, and the referee on duty, the video referee and the opposing player have no objection. If you have to find something wrong, it is the moment when Guo Tianyu and the other No. 5 player physically contacted, the No. 5 player and Guo Tianyu bumped into each other and were ejected a few meters away and fell to the ground. But in fact, looking at the slow motion, Guo Tianyu did not have any unnecessary action, the confrontation between the two did not start, and it should be the No. 5 player who took the initiative to find Guo Tianyu's confrontation, but finally fell out a little far, giving people the illusion. If such a clean confrontation can be called a foul, then Chinese football is really incurable, and the referee expert should not study table tennis less.

Guo Tianyu's goal was invalid, did the referee expert really say this?

In the international arena, Chinese players do not eat less physical losses, a large part of which lies in some penalties in the Chinese Super League, as long as there is physical confrontation, those who fall to the ground will stand, and those who fall to the ground will sound the whistle, such a penalty standard gives Chinese players a psychological hint, as long as they encounter confrontation and fall to the ground. But in the international arena, the referee is not accustomed to you, as long as it is a reasonable physical confrontation, even if you fall exaggerated, the referee will not care. In the end, the mistakes made by these Chinese referees will be paid by Chinese football, which is really too difficult.

Read on