laitimes

At the peak of Kaka, Rivaldo and him, who is stronger? Who has a higher historical place in football?

At the peak of Kaka, Rivaldo and Figo who is stronger? Who has a higher historical status?

Rivaldo's entire career was the strongest, Kaka's peak was the strongest, and Figo's technique was the most comprehensive.

Who has a higher historical place in football? I still support Rivaldo.

Although in terms of appearance, there is still a gap of 18,000 miles between Rivaldo and Kaka or Figo.

At the peak of Kaka, Rivaldo and him, who is stronger? Who has a higher historical place in football?

As an old ball blind who watches the ball and spends electricity, I first answer the topic of "Who is the strongest at the peak of KacarivardoFigo".

If you only talk about the performance at the peak, it must be Kaka.

Kaka, Rivaldo and Figo are all Ballon d'Or winners.

Figo's peak performance was in 2000, when Figo represented Portugal in the European Cup and attracted attention from Barca's sky-high transfer to Real Madrid.

Rivaldo's peak was in 1999, when he scored a hat-trick for Barca in the Champions League against Manchester United, leading Brazil to the Copa America as the best player and top scorer.

Of course, Rivaldo was also in good form in 2002, with 5 goals and 4 assists in 7 games, helping Brazil win the World Cup.

At the peak of Kaka, Rivaldo and him, who is stronger? Who has a higher historical place in football?
At the peak of Kaka, Rivaldo and him, who is stronger? Who has a higher historical place in football?

In contrast, Kaka, at its peak in 2007, had a more "single-handed" feeling, winning the Champions League Golden Boot and Best Player as a midfielder, leading AC Milan to the Champions League title.

Of course, you can say that Rivaldo and Figo have also won the Champions League, of which Rivaldo is still one of the core of the World Cup winning team, but the problem is that Kaka in 2007, the performance is too bad.

At that time, AC Milan, because of the telephone gate incident, was on the decline, Kaka staged the miracle of "one person's Champions League", suppressed C Ronaldo and Messi, and won the Ballon d'Or.

At the peak of Rivaldo, with core teammates such as Figo, Ronaldo and Ronaldinho, the "Core Leadership Index" is not as single as Kaka.

At the peak of Figo's reign, he paid more attention to the overall style of play than to the sharpness of individual ability.

At the peak of Kaka, Rivaldo and him, who is stronger? Who has a higher historical place in football?

Speaking of which, our first question has been answered, although Kaka's shooting and scoring efficiency is not as good as Rivaldo's, and his organizational scheduling ability is not as good as Figo's, but at his peak, Kaka is physically strong, explosive, with the ball to attack the tiger, passing and shooting ability is also very strong, with the ability of a person to change a team.

Even, I can say that if we don't look at the performance of the player's entire football career, but only look at the annual performance, the last 30 years, 2007 Kaka, may be ranked first!

Kaka at his peak was better than Figo and Rivaldo at his peak.

At the peak of Kaka, Rivaldo and him, who is stronger? Who has a higher historical place in football?

If the peak height of a player only depends on the state of the player at a certain stage, then when it comes to the historical position of the player in football, it depends on the stability of the player's entire football career, I think the order is Rivaldo> Kaka> Figo.

Kaka was strong in 2007, but injuries caught him up, and after moving to Real Madrid, Kaka quickly went downhill and didn't perform much in the World Cup.

Figo broke out too late, in Real Madrid and Barca is to win the Champions League or La Liga title such an honor, Inter Milan is also technical poverty alleviation, but Figo's Portugal team can not win the championship, will not affect the strength of the players, but will affect the historical status of the players.

At the peak of Kaka, Rivaldo and him, who is stronger? Who has a higher historical place in football?
At the peak of Kaka, Rivaldo and him, who is stronger? Who has a higher historical place in football?

In contrast, Rivaldo, who has a mediocre appearance, is more stable.

Rivaldo, who plays as a front or left winger, is a midfielder, but he can often complete more than 20 goals in a single season at Barca, and his stability is very strong.

Rivaldo has won the World Cup, Copa America and Confederations Cup, the "Demon Knife" World Cup record, is a crown and a runner-up, two World Cups scored 4 goals and 5 goals respectively, in brazil performance, no loss to Ronaldo.

Able to maintain excellent competitive form for a long time, in terms of football's historical position, Rivaldo is higher than Kaka and Figo!

At the peak of Kaka, Rivaldo and him, who is stronger? Who has a higher historical place in football?

To sum up my answer, Kaka at his peak > Rivaldo at his peak > Figo at his peak. Football's historical position, Rivaldo > Kaka > Figo.

Who do you think is the strongest at the peak of Kaka, Rivaldo and Figo? Who has a higher historical status? Welcome to discuss together.

Read on