laitimes

"No Time to Die" might be good, if it wasn't made by James Bond

author:Xiaodong film and television appreciation

007: Immaculate Death is the 25th film in the 007 series, directed by Kerry Fowon and starring Daniel Craig, Ralph Fiennes, Naomi Harris, Leia Saidu, ben Weshao, and others.

The film tells the story of a retired Bond living a quiet life in Jamaica until his old CIA friend Felix Wright comes to ask for help.

"No Time to Die" might be good, if it wasn't made by James Bond

The world situation is unpredictable, bond who is once again out of the mountains is facing an unprecedented crisis in history, and the story of legendary Agent 007 reaches its climax in this movie. The new and old characters, Leia Saidu returned, playing the bond girl Madeleine for the second time. The series' most feared villain, Safin, appears on stage, showing his cruel side mercilessly, not only uncovering Madeleine's hidden secrets, but also brewing a conspiracy to endanger the lives of millions of people, and the ghost party seems to surface again. Agent 00 and the mysterious woman who are halfway out of the way seem to be fighting with Bond, but the real purpose is still a mystery. New hatred ensued about Bond's life and death. Can he save the world under the dark tide?

"No Time to Die" might be good, if it wasn't made by James Bond

But is the show still James Bond?

The charm of this character lies in the fact that he is alone and carefree, that he sleeps all over the world beautiful women but can still get out of the way, flowing and ruthless.

Bond and his children are like oil and water, impossible to be compatible – who goes into the cinema to watch Bond do the fatherhood of his children? Why give him a completely unnecessary identity?

"No Time to Die" might be good, if it wasn't made by James Bond

The famous British nonfiction writer Bane Marcris wrote: "Bond has no friends, no political positions, no family, no past. It is under such conditions that he is able to fight for the queen and the country, always lonely and sad, which is the core of this role. The decision to give him a child was both vulgar and ridiculous – how could Bond allow himself to keep the child? He doesn't know if the child will be the handle?

Bond has always had his own inherent image, Scotsman, brunette, elegant gentleman, love expert, cold, humorous, drinking spirits, smoking cigars... The third Bond Roger Moore would be questioned for the difference between the yellow hair and the description in Ian Fleming's original book. The fourth Bond Timothy Dalton would be accused of impureness for the change in Moneypenny's pronunciation from up-key to down-key. For decades, Bond's image has been executed in a generally unchanging routine.

"No Time to Die" might be good, if it wasn't made by James Bond

Until the end of the Cold War, assuming that the disappearance of the enemy brought about a huge change in 007, in short, we must fight more against anarchists and terrorists. This is Pierce Brosnan's role as Bond and the starting point for my acquaintance with 007. During this period, film technology has made great progress. More modern action filming techniques and dazzling stunt scenes fill Bond films with sensory stimulation. In addition, Bond had enough intrinsic elements to supply, which made me a loyal Bond fan on TV when I was younger.

"No Time to Die" might be good, if it wasn't made by James Bond

Now that Bond has a child and Bond is dead, that's just part of the change. Since its inception, Bond Film has been just an entertainment-oriented film. It's not excellent, it's not advanced, it's not even mainstream. Its classics come from the accumulation and inheritance of time, but today, all this is no longer in line with the times.

"No Time to Die" might be good, if it wasn't made by James Bond

007, as the protagonist of an enduring series of IP, has irreversible rules. I dare say one of them is that he can't die. He's a character we can watch him get born and die without worrying that he's really going to leave. He will be defeated temporarily, but never truly. It was his aura and magic. The reason audiences have loved him for generations is this impracticality.

Read on