The "Breakout", known as "The Name of the People 2", has finally been updated and read.
I thought it would be the same as the previous anti-corruption TV series, which made people feel very enjoyable, and after watching it, it was still endless, but I thought about it a lot. This drama successfully let me watch it as a soap opera, the beginning is not bad, but the more I watch it, the more I want to fast-forward to watch it.
In order to express some of my unhappy feelings about this drama, I would like to express a few personal opinions:
1, the feeling of the tiger's tail of this TV series is too heavy: the first 20 episodes are basically chased every day to watch, there are many step-by-step temptation feelings to let themselves go to see, although they feel that once they arrive at the key place, the next episode is still good; the back half is like pork injected with water, although you want to eat, but you always feel too procrastinating, the plot is procrastinating, the characters are procrastinating, the key characters are procrastinating, etc., step by step slowing down the plot, making people feel that it is tasteless and regrettable to abandon it; so it is a pity to keep fast-forwarding, The fastest time is to watch an episode in 10 minutes, because a lot of content is guessed, it is really not interesting;
2, the finale of the characters of the treatment is too concise, people can't help but exclaim "just deal with it like this?" "By the time of the finale, we basically know which characters will be involved through the previous narratives or deductions, but when it comes to receiving the punishment or reward they deserve, it feels so unworthy to talk about? Through a simple narration, who and who handled how, how the work was carried out, even the tense link of arrest, the trial of prisoners, and the reward for meritorious people were expressed in a few words. There is no cool feeling at all, can only say that it is too watery.
3. The interpretation of historical dramas can be completely deleted: we all know that such enterprises have a deep historical background, are involved with the fate of the country, and have made a lot of contributions and sacrifices for the country, so that they have the current achievements. I think it can be made clear through the side or the historical witness wall, there is no need to suddenly jump to the top of the historical drama when the characters narrate other things, making people feel procrastinating and having to reorganize the relationship between the characters, how tired?
4, small theater (two or three people talking) too much, too long: the whole world in many places are through two people or three people in the discussion of one thing, the reverse of the past, many things repeated several times, from different characters to say once, do not feel tired? Talking about two or three people, there is no truth or famous saying, it is really a bit wordy. Just like the dialogue with Lin Manjiang at the end, it took almost an episode, and the other characters ended in a hurry, is this really the point?
5. The appearance or ending of some key figures is not clear, why is it? For example, Qin Xiaochong has always been a very important narrative line from beginning to end, but it took so long, and the final result did prove that he was framed, but what is the relationship with the main line of the whole story? I thought there would be a big thunder?
In order to express dissatisfaction with the show, unhappiness, disappointment and other emotions, close-up of the above content, personal opinions, no targeting; a good TV series is easy and difficult, treat the drama itself with heart, may be very popular, use the audience as a fool, estimate that they are also a fool; commercialization is too heavy, want to buy a good price, may be like the characters in the play, they are a joke, cut a wave of leeks.
If you have seen it, you are welcome to exchange or comment on your opinion.