laitimes

Six restaurants in Beijing were called off from operating online involving coco and so on

author:Sino-Singapore warp and weft

  Zhongxin Jingwei November 11, Beijing Fangshan District Market Supervision Bureau WeChat signal "there is a city to say things" on the 11th news, 6 local restaurants due to the mixing of pools, arrange for people who have not obtained health certificates to engage in work in contact with direct food, etc., have been stopped from online business, involving coco can and other brands.

  Beijing Fangshan District Market Supervision Bureau said that recently, in response to the food safety problems of various Internet red chain restaurants exposed by the media, the bureau strictly followed the "four strictest" requirements to carry out a major inspection and rectification of food safety in the catering industry.

  1. Beijing Li Jia Lin Food Co., Ltd. (Li Jia Lin Bakery), the party's behavior of not equipping non-manually opened garbage cans, etc., violated the provisions of item (2) of the first paragraph of Article 33 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and in accordance with the provisions of item (13) of the first paragraph of Article 126 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, it was given a warning penalty and stopped online business.

  2. Beijing Longtai Xiangchen Catering Management Co., Ltd. (Qintang Hanfu), the party's unauthorized change of the layout process of the back kitchen violated the provisions of Article 47 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and in accordance with the provisions of Item (11) of the first paragraph of Article 126 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, the party was given a warning penalty and stopped online business.

  3. Beijing Keluo Beverage Management Co., Ltd. Fangshan Liangxiang East Road Store (coco duke), the party's mixed use of the pool violated the provisions of article 33, paragraph 1, item (4) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and in accordance with the provisions of article 126, paragraph 1, item (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, it was given a warning penalty and stopped online business.

  4. Beijing Chenkun Farmhouse Catering Co., Ltd. (Chenkun Farmhouse), the party concerned arranged for a person who has not obtained a health certificate to engage in the work of contacting food for direct consumption, which violated the provisions of article 45, paragraph 2 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and in accordance with the provisions of article 126, paragraph 1, item (6) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, a warning penalty was given and the online business behavior was stopped.

  5. Beijing Luxi Catering Co., Ltd. (Xinjingwei Bakery), the party's failure to formulate and implement the production and operation process control requirements in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of Article 33, Paragraph 1, Item (1) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given a warning penalty and stopped online business in accordance with the provisions of Article 126, Paragraph 1, Item (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.

  6. Beijing Xiaohuge Catering Co., Ltd. (tea pot hot skewer), the party's failure to formulate and implement the production and operation process control requirements in accordance with the regulations, violating the provisions of article 33, paragraph 1, item (1) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, was given a warning penalty and stopped online business in accordance with the provisions of article 126, paragraph 1, item (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China. (Zhongxin Jingwei APP)