laitimes

Vigilance: Some people, under the banner of "anti-war," are opposing national reunification

author:Morning dawn talks about soldiers

With the recent tension in the Taiwan Strait, a number of shouting and beating voices have appeared on the Internet, and some anti-war voices have also appeared. This is normal, ordinary people, express their own views, there is nothing wrong with it. However, in the voice of anti-war, there is such a phenomenon -- there are some articles that, through storytelling or borrowing ancient irony and other means, shout that the rise and fall of the country, honor and disgrace have nothing to do with the people, no matter what kind of war, it will only bring suffering to the people, so I advise everyone that war is wrong and we must oppose war.

Vigilance: Some people, under the banner of "anti-war," are opposing national reunification

If this kind of article appears sporadically in normal times, it can also be regarded as a personal point of view or a feeling, but at the moment when the situation in the Taiwan Strait is tense and the voices on the Internet are shouting and beating, such a batch of articles suddenly appears in a concentrated manner, and there are some problems. At present, the Chinese side has no obvious threat of war in other directions, so their goal is also very clear, that is, to oppose war in the Taiwan Strait. If they can say that they want peaceful reunification, but they do not (because their basis is that the rise and fall of the country has nothing to do with themselves), it is clear that their goal is to oppose national reunification.

Vigilance: Some people, under the banner of "anti-war," are opposing national reunification

The logic of these articles is quite confusing at first glance, but there is a big loophole, that is, it cannot be read by soldiers. According to the logic of those articles, the first thing to be relieved of responsibility is the army that defends the country. And once the army is no longer defending the country, the country is dead.

They shout that war is evil, but deliberately ignore that war is also qualitative. Is the war against aggression also a war, evil? For example, on the Sino-Indian border, the Indian army invaded our land, can't we resist? Just watching the country continue to be occupied?

Vigilance: Some people, under the banner of "anti-war," are opposing national reunification

So, this is a set of subjugation theories. And if this logic is put into social life, then the firefighters should not put out the fire, the doctors should not "retrograde" during the epidemic period, and the people should not see the righteous courage for the sake of... Wouldn't society be a mess?

Therefore, these people call on people not to care about the country, only to focus on their own interests, which on the surface seems to be "treating ignorance as selfishness", but at this special moment, it is actually an ulterior motive. Some people say that behind these people, it is not excluded that there is a figure of Tai D, because they are most afraid of the mainland military unification - who knows, perhaps, there is.

Author: Dream Hunting