天天看點

Kafka源碼深度解析-序列5 -Producer -RecordAccumulator隊列分析

原文位址

在Kafka源碼分析-序列2中,我們提到了整個Producer client的架構圖,如下所示:

其它幾個元件我們在前面都講過了,今天講述最後一個元件RecordAccumulator.

Batch發送

在以前的kafka client中,每條消息稱為 “Message”,而在Java版client中,稱之為”Record”,同時又因為有批量發送累積功能,是以稱之為RecordAccumulator.

RecordAccumulator最大的一個特性就是batch消息,扔到隊列中的多個消息,可能組成一個RecordBatch,然後由Sender一次性發送出去。

每個TopicPartition一個隊列

下面是RecordAccumulator的内部結構,可以看到,每個TopicPartition對應一個消息隊列,隻有同一個TopicPartition的消息,才可能被batch。

public final class RecordAccumulator {
    private final ConcurrentMap<TopicPartition, Deque<RecordBatch>> batches;   ...}123456      

batch的政策

那什麼時候,消息會被batch,什麼時候不會呢?下面從KafkaProducer的send方法看起:

//KafkaProducer
    public Future<RecordMetadata> send(ProducerRecord<K, V> record, Callback callback) {        try {
            // first make sure the metadata for the topic is available
            long waitedOnMetadataMs = waitOnMetadata(record.topic(), this.maxBlockTimeMs);            ...

            RecordAccumulator.RecordAppendResult result = accumulator.append(tp, serializedKey, serializedValue, callback, remainingWaitMs);   //核心函數:把消息放入隊列            if (result.batchIsFull || result.newBatchCreated) {
                log.trace("Waking up the sender since topic {} partition {} is either full or getting a new batch", record.topic(), partition);
                this.sender.wakeup();
            }            return result.future;123456789101112131415      

從上面代碼可以看到,batch邏輯,都在accumulator.append函數裡面:

    public RecordAppendResult append(TopicPartition tp, byte[] key, byte[] value, Callback callback, long maxTimeToBlock) throws InterruptedException {
        appendsInProgress.incrementAndGet();        try {            if (closed)                throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot send after the producer is closed.");
            Deque<RecordBatch> dq = dequeFor(tp);  //找到該topicPartiton對應的消息隊列
            synchronized (dq) {
                RecordBatch last = dq.peekLast(); //拿出隊列的最後1個元素
                if (last != null) {  
                    FutureRecordMetadata future = last.tryAppend(key, value, callback, time.milliseconds()); //最後一個元素, 即RecordBatch不為空,把該Record加入該RecordBatch
                    if (future != null)                        return new RecordAppendResult(future, dq.size() > 1 || last.records.isFull(), false);
                }
            }            int size = Math.max(this.batchSize, Records.LOG_OVERHEAD + Record.recordSize(key, value));
            log.trace("Allocating a new {} byte message buffer for topic {} partition {}", size, tp.topic(), tp.partition());
            ByteBuffer buffer = free.allocate(size, maxTimeToBlock);
            synchronized (dq) {                // Need to check if producer is closed again after grabbing the dequeue lock.
                if (closed)                    throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot send after the producer is closed.");
                RecordBatch last = dq.peekLast();                if (last != null) {
                    FutureRecordMetadata future = last.tryAppend(key, value, callback, time.milliseconds());                    if (future != null) {                        // Somebody else found us a batch, return the one we waited for! Hopefully this doesn't happen often...
                        free.deallocate(buffer);                        return new RecordAppendResult(future, dq.size() > 1 || last.records.isFull(), false);
                    }
                }                //隊列裡面沒有RecordBatch,建一個新的,然後把Record放進去
                MemoryRecords records = MemoryRecords.emptyRecords(buffer, compression, this.batchSize);
                RecordBatch batch = new RecordBatch(tp, records, time.milliseconds());
                FutureRecordMetadata future = Utils.notNull(batch.tryAppend(key, value, callback, time.milliseconds()));

                dq.addLast(batch);
                incomplete.add(batch);                return new RecordAppendResult(future, dq.size() > 1 || batch.records.isFull(), true);
            }
        } finally {
            appendsInProgress.decrementAndGet();
        }
    }    private Deque<RecordBatch> dequeFor(TopicPartition tp) {
        Deque<RecordBatch> d = this.batches.get(tp);        if (d != null)            return d;
        d = new ArrayDeque<>();
        Deque<RecordBatch> previous = this.batches.putIfAbsent(tp, d);        if (previous == null)            return d;        else
            return previous;
    }123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657      

從上面代碼我們可以看出Batch的政策: 

1。如果是同步發送,每次去隊列取,RecordBatch都會為空。這個時候,消息就不會batch,一個Record形成一個RecordBatch

2。Producer 入隊速率 < Sender出隊速率 && lingerMs = 0 ,消息也不會被batch

3。Producer 入隊速率 > Sender出對速率, 消息會被batch

4。lingerMs > 0,這個時候Sender會等待,直到lingerMs > 0 或者 隊列滿了,或者超過了一個RecordBatch的最大值,就會發送。這個邏輯在RecordAccumulator的ready函數裡面。

    public ReadyCheckResult ready(Cluster cluster, long nowMs) {
        Set<Node> readyNodes = new HashSet<Node>();        long nextReadyCheckDelayMs = Long.MAX_VALUE;        boolean unknownLeadersExist = false;        boolean exhausted = this.free.queued() > 0;        for (Map.Entry<TopicPartition, Deque<RecordBatch>> entry : this.batches.entrySet()) {
            TopicPartition part = entry.getKey();
            Deque<RecordBatch> deque = entry.getValue();

            Node leader = cluster.leaderFor(part);            if (leader == null) {
                unknownLeadersExist = true;
            } else if (!readyNodes.contains(leader)) {                synchronized (deque) {
                    RecordBatch batch = deque.peekFirst();                    if (batch != null) {                        boolean backingOff = batch.attempts > 0 && batch.lastAttemptMs + retryBackoffMs > nowMs;                        long waitedTimeMs = nowMs - batch.lastAttemptMs;                        long timeToWaitMs = backingOff ? retryBackoffMs : lingerMs;                        long timeLeftMs = Math.max(timeToWaitMs - waitedTimeMs, 0);                        boolean full = deque.size() > 1 || batch.records.isFull();                        boolean expired = waitedTimeMs >= timeToWaitMs;                        boolean sendable = full || expired || exhausted || closed || flushInProgress();  //關鍵的一句話
                        if (sendable && !backingOff) {
                            readyNodes.add(leader);
                        } else {

                            nextReadyCheckDelayMs = Math.min(timeLeftMs, nextReadyCheckDelayMs);
                        }
                    }
                }
            }
        }        return new ReadyCheckResult(readyNodes, nextReadyCheckDelayMs, unknownLeadersExist);
    }12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637      

為什麼是Deque?

在上面我們看到,消息隊列用的是一個“雙端隊列“,而不是普通的隊列。 

一端生産,一端消費,用一個普通的隊列不就可以嗎,為什麼要“雙端“呢?