2015 Top 10程式設計語言The 2015 Top Ten Programming Languages

By Stephen Cass

Posted 20 Jul 2015 | 15:12 GMT

<a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/the-2015-top-ten-programming-languages#" target="_blank"> Share</a>

|

<a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/the-2015-top-ten-programming-languages#" target="_blank"> Email</a>

<a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/the-2015-top-ten-programming-languages#" target="_blank"> Print</a>

<a href="http://ieeespectrumreprints.magreprints.com/" target="_blank"> Reprint</a>

Illustration: iStockphoto

We put a number of preset weightings into the app for convenience; the default is the IEEE Spectrum ranking, with weights chosen to broadly represent the interests of IEEE members, and here are this year’s top 10 languages from that weighting. (The column on the left is the 2015 ranking; the column on the right is the 2014 ranking for comparison.)

A few languages have dropped off the rankings compared with last year’s. Mostly this is due to an insufficient presence in this year’s data to justify keeping them in. But in one case, an entry was dropped because we agreed with comments on last year’s ranking that said we had made a mistake in categorizing it as a language rather than just a framework. This was ASP.NET, and we had originally included it because of our pragmatic approach to the definition of programming language—a lack of Turing completeness is not an absolute bar, and we make no apologies for including things like HTML—but we were too broad on that one.

本文轉自 h2appy  51CTO部落格，原文連結：http://blog.51cto.com/h2appy/1701731，如需轉載請自行聯系原作者