laitimes

The dead have land, but the living have no land? If the distribution is disrupted, will the peasants support it?

author:Good luck accompanies you

As the old saying goes, "A man dies like a lamp goes out, but the field is left in the world." "In our countryside, this field is like a silent watchman, witnessing the changes of the world. But if one day suddenly this rule is broken, and the fields of the dead are to be distributed to the living, what will the peasant friends think about this?

The dead have land, but the living have no land? If the distribution is disrupted, will the peasants support it?

First of all, we have to understand that for farmers, this field is not only a tool for growing food, but also a guarantee of life and the continuation of the family. Just like the saying "dig in the soil, rely on the field to eat", the field is their root. For the older generation, it is the land watered by the sweat of their ancestors, and they may be a little reluctant, after all, every field hides their memories and expectations.

The dead have land, but the living have no land? If the distribution is disrupted, will the peasants support it?

"Land is the lifeblood of farmers." This sentence is bigger than the sky in the hearts of the peasants. If the distribution of land changes, they may worry that their share of security will be lost, and they may end up with no land to work after a lifetime of hard work. It's like an old man who is suddenly told that the child he has worked so hard to raise is going to give his house to someone else, do you think he can be happy?

The dead have land, but the living have no land? If the distribution is disrupted, will the peasants support it?

However, times are changing, and so are policies. The state has always advocated fairness and justice and paid attention to people's livelihood. If this change is to give more people the opportunity to own land and achieve common prosperity, then perhaps farmers will understand. After all, "the world is for the public, and everyone has a share", this is the ideal of the ancients, and it is also the direction of modern social governance.

"Land is for farming, not for hoarding." These words are even more powerful now. If distribution can bring more young people back to the fields and make agriculture a more attractive industry, then farmers may see hope and a better life for the next generation.

The dead have land, but the living have no land? If the distribution is disrupted, will the peasants support it?

But the key depends on how to operate, how to ensure fairness, and how to avoid big pot rice. What farmers need is tangible benefits and tangible guarantees. If they can do this, I think they will be willing to accept this new beginning, even if they are reluctant.

In general, the dead have land, and the living have no land, which tugs at the heartstrings of the peasants. It is not only a land issue, but also a major issue related to the rights and interests of farmers and their future. What we look forward to is the wisdom and warmth of the policy, so that every farmer can find his own piece of the world in the field.

The dead have land, but the living have no land? If the distribution is disrupted, will the peasants support it?

This article, like a bowl of hot homely food, hopes to arouse everyone's thinking and discussion. If you also have any opinions, you may wish to leave a message in the comment area and let's talk about this topic together. After all, everyone is part of the story of the land, so let's witness this change of land together and see what the future holds.

The dead have land, but the living have no land? If the distribution is disrupted, will the peasants support it?

#农民权益# #土地改革# #公平分配#

Read on