Talk about Australia today. The United States and Australia have recently hooked up very tightly, and the United States has armed Australia.
The United States said that France is not good for Australia, more than 50 billion euros, only to give people 11 conventional power submarines, I directly give him nuclear submarines! Australian media, politicians and anti-China groups cheered. What level of American nuclear submarines? U.S. nuclear submarines are indeed advanced.
Advanced is advanced, but advanced does not equal fast progress. The advancement of American submarines and the speed at which he supplied Australia with nuclear submarines are two completely different things. 20 years, it took 20 years to build half a submarine, not a submarine. Therefore, it turns out that 20 years to form combat strength, this is a joke! What will China look like after 20 years? Morrison had already gone home.
According to the road map for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, socialist modernization will be basically realized from 2021 to 2035, and a socialist modern power will be built from 2036 to 2050.
It was 20 years before half a nuclear submarine was launched in Australia, which sounds like a joke! But why did the United States do this? Isn't the United States arming Australia sincerely? Of course, he wants to build an "Asian mini-NATO" through Australia, India, and Japan, and then live with China.
The United States has such sincerity, but the strangest thing about the United States is that it is divided, the president says one set, the other department says one set, the president will say one set and then say another set, the front president will say a set, and the back president will say another set. But all contradictory voices, fine opinions, in the end there is always a final say.
This is the capitalist interest group that truly determines the fate of the United States. Below the subdivision are the military-industrial complex, the Jewish group, the financial group, the Wall Street "fat cat" and so on. Therefore, if you don't have to listen to the message from the United States, you only listen to the politicians who say it well, touch the Bible with your hands, wear a suit and tie, smile and squint and tell you, you must not believe, who believes who is stupid.
In such a complex decision-making context, the United States has developed a strong multilateral mechanism. Just like the law of parallelograms of force that you learned in middle school, he wants to make n parallelograms, what do you say comes out of the end? Therefore, Hu Xijin says complex China every day, and I tell you, we can't look at the United States as simple, the United States is also a complex America.
Yellen, fed chair, is now U.S. Treasury Secretary, an old lady with whiter hair than mine. Recently, on the issue of the Sino-US trade war, the old lady took a turn, 180 degrees, the old lady began to say good things about China, and the old lady even said "it is not China that needs the United States, but the United States needs China."
Yellen
Dai Qi, the United States Trade Representative. On the issue of the Sino-US trade war, her current statement and Pompeo and Trump's statement have also taken a big turn. These aspects are positive, and China and the United States must always stabilize. The United States cannot find a country like China in the world that can guarantee quality and quantity and supply the needs of the Market of American capitalists.
Dai Qi
At the same time, however, Blinken is pulling a ghost on the Taiwan issue and wants to drag Taiwan into the United Nations. Biden made a gesture of going to the toilet and said, "We want to defend Taiwan." Isn't that fine points?
Blinken
In the case of Australia, the fine points of the United States are more obvious. As you know, after entering late October, Britain and France threatened each other, you sanctioned me, I sanctioned you, you seized my fishing boat, I summoned your ambassador. This series of storms, mainly because Macron went home before, discussed with female teachers, the British did ghosts, and the large order of more than 50 billion euros was robbed by the Americans.
Britain and the United States have stolen France's big orders in one go, so France will hold its breath and recall the American ambassador, the United States can't do it, and finally send the ambassador over.
France and Australia see no signs of improvement, they are facing the United Kingdom, and the United Kingdom has previously had a fishing dispute, the fishery dispute adopts an uncompromising attitude, and the power supply problem is troublesome. New hatred and old hatred have surged into the heart, France and Britain have never been at odds, and this is complicated again.
As a result, Paris still resents the fact that on September 15, US President Biden, British Prime Minister Johnson and Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison joined forces to tear up the submarine construction contract signed with Australia and France. France not only suffered from its interests, more than 50 billion euros, which is a big deal for France. More importantly, France was humiliated like never before. Continuing this storm reminds the outside world of Australia's "nuclear submarines".
Where in the United States is such a big brother, this big brother is not reliable! France has been deceived, the relationship between France and the United States is slowly repairing, and the wounds in the heart can only be calmed down by the flow of time.
Australia has been making a fuss lately, saying, "The United States, Britain, are all playing us." Sources say that the British company Rolls-Royce, as well as aerospace systems, are preparing to supply reactors to Australian nuclear submarines. U.S. Defense Secretary General Austin intervened in the supply of materials for nuclear submarines. Everything is twisted and turned, and it is not so easy. The plant in Adelaide, Australia, is poised to take over the project, and the Australian military may choose between the Virginia class in the United States and the agile class in the United Kingdom.
Now for France, the Australian army's initial requirement was that nuclear submarines be compatible with the equipment of the US Virginia-class nuclear submarines, and now this requirement has become a reminder. In 2019, the Australian side repeatedly criticized France because it was not satisfied with the project. Now the Australian side has finally achieved results and got a nuclear submarine. But the United States, on the other hand, drew a nuclear submarine pie and delivered it 20 years later.
People are the same, the country is the same, when they need something, they want to get it now, and the psychology of young children is the same. When france has been offended, the Americans will comfort you, and then draw you a big pie, give you half a nuclear submarine for 20 years, and play people like this.
Australia's "Financial Review" and Australia's "Defence Magazine" reported that according to the news of the Australian military and political high-level, the Australian military will not choose to lease US warships in the future, and will be assembled in the Adelaide factory, but the process is very long.
The relationship between Australia and China, which used to be a model of peaceful coexistence between two countries with different civilizations, has turned upside down in recent years. Of course, all the responsibility is on the Australian side, and he is deliberately and sincerely shrinking this ass to the side of the United States, to play the pawn of the United States to suppress China. The United States says it will give you half a nuclear submarine in 20 years, but now it will have to give me money. Australia is stupid, so what to do? At this point, I had to arch forward with my scalp. In addition to taking the money, you have to wait patiently.
Not only that, but it's actually more bullying. It is impossible to imagine that Australia will do it itself, but Australia can only participate in 40% of the shipbuilding work, and the second half and 60% of the reactor will be completed in "other countries". That is to say, Australia, no matter how hard it works, has no way to determine the construction period. Is it 20 years or 23 years? That's what the U.S. says.
Does the United States have the final say, and Biden have the final say? When Biden did not make it to the final election, the United States changed. Who can Biden decide, so who will decide in the end? Military-industrial complexes, I once had a series of programs dedicated to military-industrial complexes. Eisenhower raised the alarm against the military-industrial complex, which kidnapped the United States, which is a tumor living in the American body and absorbs all the nutrients. By now, the tumor was getting bigger and bigger.
Australia can't solve this problem now, so Australia is now equivalent to saying that it has just been cleaned up in this place, and the Americans and the British are doing the ghost together. Australia is now, and it would be stupid if the Morrison authorities hadn't woken up.
Australia's Hu Xijin is now the most uncomfortable, Australia has a lot of people like Song Xiaojun, they say how powerful the Virginia-class submarines of the United States are, and then the average duration of the Virginia-class submarines is how long. So, Some time ago, Australia cheered that the delivery time should be six years, up to ten years.
Now, for the first time, the U.S. side has disclosed the Morrison authorities' plan to launch the "first submarine in 2040." That means that it will be 20 years before Australia can consider dealing with China's nuclear submarines, and then your nuclear submarines can be used, which is too many variables.
I find it interesting that the Australian media has been talking about this recently. Chairman Mao taught us that the enemy has never been an iron target. Without distinction, there is no policy. So the change in Australian politics, if Morrison goes down, Morrison's internal opposition party, we have to do in-depth and meticulous work, and strive to make it change in this matter, to promote its change, to change to a favorable outcome for China.
Morrison
All in all, Australia is now a big head, being played. So now, Australia is still controlled by morrison group, how about Morrison's ability to control? When can the result of being controlled or out of control occur? What we are seeing now is that there are various forces within Australia that have been lost, and some people have expressed dissatisfaction with the Morrison government.
Australia is also a country of vote politics, and there are opposition parties in vote politics countries, and it is not surprising that if they have internal contradictions and struggles, and one day there is a certain outcome. Therefore, whether the US nuclear submarine can arm Australia is still a big variable.