Recently, Xu Jiao responded bluntly to Zheng's series of actions yesterday, so today, Yu Zheng responded to this matter with a long article. It is worth noting that in the response, Yu Zheng inadvertently revealed that Xu Jiao and Zhao Qing had not added WeChat before. This wave of unforeseen information immediately sparked heated public debate.
Looking back on this controversy, it began when Yu Zheng evaluated Zhao Qing's body shape, calling him "fat". In this debate about body shape and beauty, Xu Jiao stood up to clarify the facts, pointing directly at Yu Zheng's deformed aesthetics, which was regarded as the voice of justice.
Although there is no intimate interaction between Xu Jiao and Zhao Qing on WeChat, Xu Jiao still fearlessly takes on the role of voice for Zhao Qing and many other women who suffer from the same problems due to body anxiety. Such an action is undoubtedly commendable.
Yu Zheng's response in his long essay is full of subtle words, and he tries to clarify that the whole incident is just a misunderstanding, but between the words, there seems to be a certain degree of sarcasm on Xu Jiao and Zhao Qing, implying that the two are not friends, and may even be a simple partnership. At this point, the public has a deeper interpretation of Xu Jiao's previous statements, and regards her actions as a more fair and selfless performance.
There is a widely circulated saying that Yu Zheng has a scheming heart, and is even considered to be a talker in the entertainment industry. In this case, his marketing skills once again showed his language charm and relationship handling skills.
Yu Zheng's post seems to have stolen the public's audio-visual focus, shifting from the important social issue of body anxiety to discussing the ordinary but less important connection between Xu Jiao and Zhao Qing - the WeChat relationship. This ability to shift perspectives really makes people have to admire Yu Zheng's means of public opinion manipulation.
On social media, many people followed Yu Zheng's arguments and began to accuse Xu Jiao, which made the audience feel very embarrassed. In an age known as the plastic sisters, true righteousness and care seem to have been replaced by the appearance of social network relationships. But Xu Jiao's behavior this time obviously gave a different answer.
The most important problem is that Yu Zheng, a recognized industry boss, made inappropriate comments about Zhao Qing's body shape, which created unnecessary body anxiety. Xu Jiao's response is not only an individual incident against Zhao Qing, but also a kind of solidarity with all women who are under pressure due to external aesthetics.
It was Zhao Qing who was really hurt. As a professional actor, she should be evaluated for her work, not unwarranted criticism and pressure because of her physical form. Yu Zheng's so-called "fat" is nothing more than his personal biased aesthetic standards, labeling a woman with a normal weight as inappropriate. Obviously, this is an indisrespect for the dignity of an artist and an unjust evaluation of a woman's body.
Although the fermentation of the incident affected the interaction between the two artists on WeChat, it actually touched on deeper social issues.
We can't help but ask, is Xu Jiao and Zhao Qing's WeChat relationship really that important? Can Yu Zheng's emphasis on WeChat relationship in his response shift the public's attention back to the question we should really care about: how should we stick to our own views and ideas under the social pressure of shaping a perfect body?
When the remarks of certain authority figures become a potential social orientation, how should we correctly evaluate and deal with them? Xu Jiao's voice may only be the tip of the iceberg, but her firmness and courage have undoubtedly made a clear voice for the pursuit of truth and equality in the hustle and bustle of the entertainment industry.
And Zhao Qing, along with all the women who have been hurt by her words, deserves more understanding and support.