laitimes

With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?

With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?

Although the new energy SUV market is getting hotter and hotter, if you play off-road, traditional fuel vehicles are more reliable. With the big sales of the Tank 300, more and more car companies have begun to enter the off-road vehicle market. After all, Chery's brand endorsement, coupled with the purchase threshold of 139,900, is really quite exciting, after all, the purchase threshold of the tank 300 is 199,800.

With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?
With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?

However, buying an off-road vehicle is different from buying an SUV, and the price is by no means the only factor in measuring the product, but the product power is the key. Next, let's talk about the current sales of the two cars, pay attention to the relatively high configuration, take a look at the 216,800 tank 300 and the 169,900 short-distance travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?

With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?

In terms of size, the difference between the two cars is almost negligible, with a difference of only 25mm in length and 50mm in wheelbase. However, since the modifications of the Tank 300 are more mature, the visual effect is better. One more thing to say here is that although the purchase threshold of 169,900 short-distance travelers is low, due to the time of listing, the current modification of the car is obviously not as mature as the tank more than 300.

With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?
With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?

Another thing to note about the exterior size is that they are both off-road vehicles with certain differences in approach and departure angles. The approach and departure angles of the Tank 300 are 33 and 34 degrees, respectively, while the approach and departure angles of the Jet Traveler are both 28 degrees, which is a bit different. To put it simply, the off-road performance of the Tank 300 is much better than that of the Jet Traveler, whose approach and departure angles are not much different from those of a regular urban SUV.

With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?
With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?

In the interior part, the design of the two cars can only be said to have their own characteristics, due to the price, the materials used in the tank 300 are still slightly more generous, and it also looks more off-road vehicle feeling. In terms of configuration, the Jet Traveler obviously has more advantages, like both cars have lane departure systems, fatigue driving reminders, but the lower price Jet Traveler has more active braking, DOW door opening warning, front/rear collision warning... Is it suddenly like an off-road vehicle and an urban SUV?

With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?
With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?

Strictly speaking, the biggest difference between the two cars is actually in the chassis and performance section. Don't look at the two cars with 2.0T power, but the parameters are different, the maximum power of the Tank 300 is 167kW and the maximum torque is 387N·m, and the maximum power of the Jet Traveler is 187kW and the maximum torque is 390N·m, the difference is not big, but there are some of them. In terms of gearbox, the tank 300 uses an 8AT, and the short-distance traveler uses a 7-speed dual-clutch.

With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?
With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?

If the power and gearbox are still controversial, the next thing to talk about is dry goods. Don't look at the fact that both cars are equipped with a four-wheel drive system, but the Tank 300 uses time-sharing four-wheel drive, and the Jet Traveler uses time-of-time four-wheel drive, the difference is the difference between an off-road vehicle and an urban SUV. Moreover, the tank 300 uses a front double wishbone rear multi-link suspension, and the Jet Traveler uses a front MacPherson rear multi-link suspension, the difference does not need me to say more, the cost is not the same.

With 216,800 tanks and 300 tanks and 169,900 shortcut travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?

Not only that, although the 216,800 Tank 300 and the 169,900 Jet Traveler have a central differential lock, the Tank 300 has a front/rear axle differential lock, as well as low-speed four-wheel drive, tank turning, and the Jet Traveler only has a rear axle differential lock. Looking at it this way, everyone thinks that the 216,800 tank 300 and the 169,900 short-distance travelers, who is more reliable to choose off-road in Tibet?

Read on