Text|Far Mountain
Editor|Multifish
- Before reading this article, I sincerely invite you to click "Follow", which is convenient for you to discuss and share, and brings you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.
Friends who follow the history of the modern development of the international community must know that our peaceful life is very difficult at present.
Before the world ushered in a new stage of peace and development, the international community experienced two large-scale turbulences.
This is not only a disaster for human society, but also undermines the development and progress of the international community to a certain extent.
As we enter a new era, we do not want to see large-scale upheaval again.
However, the subtle changes in the current international situation have many people worried about the future development, and they do not know whether we will usher in the third large-scale turmoil next. But if a third world war breaks out, which country is safest?
According to the list drawn up by the British media, the following three countries may become paradises in turbulent times.
Country 1: Switzerland
As early as hundreds of years ago, the country had the title of "permanent neutrality".
In the two previous large-scale upheavals, the country did not participate in international conflicts because of its policy of neutrality, nor was it affected by the negative effects of these two international conflicts.
Although Switzerland is only an inconspicuous country in the European region, the overall level of development has remained quite good thanks to tranquil and peaceful development.
In addition, the country actively participates in activities related to the maintenance of international peace and plays the role of guardian.
In addition to adhering to a policy of neutrality, the country has strong economic strength and military defense capabilities. When it comes to Switzerland, the first thing that comes to mind is the country's financial industry and banking.
It is precisely because of the highly developed financial system that the country has lived a rich material life.
In addition, a solid military defense capability is an important reason why the country has the confidence to adhere to a policy of neutrality.
Although they will not take the initiative to attack outside, if there is an external enemy, the country's elite troops can also ensure the security of the country and protect the interests of the people from being harmed.
Second country: Canada
Canada, located in the northernmost region of North America, although it is a developed country with a large land area, is not very "active" in the international community, and does not pursue hegemony like the United States next door.
In the pursuit of great power status, the Canadian side has not shown enthusiasm.
However, not being positive does not mean that the country does not have sufficient strength, on the contrary, this relatively negative attitude can also become an advantage for the country to maintain peaceful and stable development.
Objectively speaking, Canada has relatively strong military capabilities, whether it is military equipment or military quality, it is one of the best in the world.
In addition to this, the country is one of the most developed in the global economy. On the one hand, it has abundant and abundant natural energy, which brings a steady stream of wealth to the country.
On the other hand, it is a relatively developed level of science and technology, which has helped the country's economic development through the transformation of science and technology into the economy.
3rd country: Australia
As a southern hemisphere country, its unique geographical advantage is an important prerequisite for Australia to maintain relatively stable development.
From the world map, Australia is very separated from other countries, and the surrounding sea provides this country with a natural defensive advantage. In particular, the Great Dividing Range in the eastern part of the country is almost a natural protective barrier for the country.
The two previous large-scale upheavails have basically not spread the war to the countries of the southern hemisphere. The relatively remote geographical location has become the advantage of Australia's relatively stable development.
According to official statistics, the country is not a populous country.
For some emerging developing countries, the demographic dividend advantage may become a boost to the country's economic development.
The relatively large population can indeed provide corresponding assistance to a certain extent. But in the absence of demographic advantages, Australia is also developing well.
In addition to its natural geographical defense advantages, the country also has relatively developed modern military equipment and a well-trained army.
Under such circumstances, Australia's overall military level is also very strong, not inferior to some developed countries in the northern hemisphere.
It is worth mentioning that the image of relevant Australian departments in the international community has always been very good.
They rarely participate in international disputes, but more play the role of mediator and intermediary, and have made many contributions to ensuring the peaceful and stable development of the international community.
That's why British media included the country on a relatively safe list during turmoil.
Generally speaking, the current development of the international community environment is not optimistic, especially the bilateral relations of some major countries are constantly becoming more and more delicate.
Along with the emergence of geopolitical conflicts, the potential for large-scale conflict and instability is also increasing. In your opinion, can these three countries bring us safety and security after the turmoil?
What do you have to say about this? Welcome to leave your opinion in the comment area!