Whether it is origin, appearance, image or word of mouth and social influence, Camilla cannot be compared with Diana. When the British royal family chose Diana, it was definitely a wise consideration, because her 15-year career as a princess greatly opened up the popularity, reputation and influence of the British royal family, greatly improved the royal family's involvement in social welfare, and allowed the royal family to connect more widely with the commoners.
Diana performed 191 official duties in 1988 alone, and three years later the number of official duties became 397 a year. At the same time, she was the first royal family member in the world to set foot in the ghetto, she ignored the royal family's objections, shook hands with AIDS patients without gloves, paid attention to lepers, went to the world's most violent minefields, called for mine clearance, and helped homeless people start a new life. Her kindness and concern for the poor underclass far surpasses all the royals, politicians and celebrities in the world. At the same time, she has truly pioneered and influenced philanthropy around the world.
Her ability to work, even if the royal family did not want to deny it, eventually followed her way, allowing her two sons to inherit the charity after her death, which continues to this day. In her own way, she changed the working mode of the royal family, even though during her lifetime, within the royal family, suffered from great prejudice, jealousy and unkindness, but her efforts have achieved great results. Because the royal family eventually changed its disregard for the people. That is why Diana is called the princess of the people. Because the standard answers left by Diana, including Camilla, are plagiarizing.
If we look at the British royal family after Camilla, it became increasingly disunited and even denigrated each other. Camila divides the royal family and frequently contributes to her own interests. Diana has never made a profit for herself and her family in her life, and the only private thing she did was to get a job for her stepmother from her boyfriend after the divorce. But Camilla, who has been busy snatching benefits from the royal family for her children, grandchildren, and ex-husbands, asking Charles to grant them knighthoods, and even saying that the queen's bloodline is equally important, which has to make us suspect that there is a desire to seize the throne.
Of course, it is not great self-interest and selfish desire, it is not the disregard for the bottom line, it is not the lack of requirements for character and morality, Camilla will not come to this day, and because of this, Diana lost her life. Charles was not fit to sit in the position of monarch, not only because of his betrayal of marriage, but because he never had a long-term vision and considered the long-term development of the royal family. I never think about what fame I will leave in history, I can't remind people of them, and I only have the impression of a sanitary pad, right?
Did Camilla's coronation hasten the twilight of the empire? Including the entire coronation this time, Charles has tried his best to reduce expenses and simplify everything, but this will not reduce the disgust of the people. Because at this moment in Britain, under high inflation, the cost of living has increased sharply, although the march and strike are not as good as in France, but the continuous decline of the empire is inevitable. In contrast, people pay more attention to their own table, whether they can eat enough three meals a day, and whether they have a fixed place. You can't afford to buy ingredients, but you can't open a fire, and when you can, the shelves are empty, and people's livelihood is difficult, and the details of the coronation can not be changed.
When the country is rich, people discuss whether the coronation of the third party occupies morality? When the country is in trouble, it is wrong to take the first leg, and when the country continues to decay, Camilla is also destined to be a witch-like ominous existence. Of course, all this, maybe Charles does not care, and I don't know if William cares, but even if he cares, there is no way.