Because of the enormous power of nuclear weapons, if the situation is not controlled, it will be the destruction of the entire human society, and in order to prevent the further spread of nuclear forces, we have jointly signed a nuclear non-proliferation agreement. But the United States is the world's most double-standard country, when the rules are beneficial to them, it is the biggest advocate of the rules, and when the rules are unfavorable to them, it is the challenger of the rules, which is also a true portrayal of the inconsistency between words and deeds of the United States. On the issue of nuclear weapons, the United States is also going its own way, while expressing support for the nuclear non-proliferation agreement, it has also launched many actions to undermine this achievement, such as the nuclear submarine agreement signed by the United States, Japan and Australia, mainly to allow Australia to have nuclear submarines, but this is also a small group they jointly provoke.
Obviously, once the nuclear submarine is deployed to Australia, it will bring great variables to the situation in the Indo-Pacific region, and although many countries have expressed opposition, it still cannot prevent the agreement from proceeding. Recently, the leaders of the United States, Britain and Australia held a meeting, and then at a press conference, they announced more details of the nuclear submarine program, and after discussion, they formulated a "four-step" plan, the first step, Australia will send personnel to the United States to study, during these five years, the United States nuclear submarine will regularly go to Australia. In the second step, the United States and the United Kingdom will deploy conventionally powered nuclear submarines in Australia in a rotational mode starting in 2027. In a third step, Australia can buy three U.S. nuclear submarines in 2030, which can be expanded to up to five. In a fourth step, the UK will deliver the first nuclear submarine under the Orkus agreement to Australia in 2040.
Simply put, the nuclear submarine agreement has indeed landed, but Australia obtained the first nuclear submarine more than a decade later, such a long time, they are destined to face many uncertainties, such as the bankruptcy of the project, not long ago there was news that Japan spent $360 billion to buy drones from the United States, originally planned to be delivered in 2021, but today, the United States has not delivered, and finally perfunctory Japan with a sentence that drones have been retired and cannot be delivered. So it's hard to say how far the four-step plan can go, and even now you can see some signs of being pitted. You know, Australia, as the "father of Party A", is obviously the person who pays the money, but does not get the core technology, and has to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to build a nuclear submarine production base, and "part-time" support and maintenance work.
In other words, the submarine base that Australia spends money to build must also provide services for the United States and Britain, which is completely a public base, spending Australian money, but to serve Britain and the United States, but also to become part of the US Indo-Pacific strategy, it is not too much to say that Australia is wronged. Doesn't Australia know this? Why should you be the unjust boss? Australia, as the main force in the plan, naturally understands the stakes, and they are willing to do so for two main reasons: on the one hand, Australia has a great power dream, and the way they approach this goal is to follow in the footsteps of the United States and increase their influence in the international community. On the other hand, Australia needs to rely on US hegemony to continue to reap political and economic benefits in the South Pacific. In general, the nuclear submarine cooperation plan has become Australia's wrong way, although it is said to target China, but it is estimated that entrapping Australia is the biggest goal. (Drink boiled water)