How Israel treats terrorists who kidnap their own nationals: kill them all, leave none.
introduction
As a country with a long history, Israel plays an important role in the Middle East, however, since its inception, Israel has faced the threat of terrorism, which has brought Israel's attitude towards terrorists into the spotlight.
This article examines Israel's treatment of terrorists who kidnap its own nationals and analyzes the historical background behind them and the provisions of international law.
Historical background
Since its inception in 1948, Israel has been under the threat of war and terrorism, and since the 1970s it has faced the threat of terrorist attacks, particularly from Palestinian terrorist organizations.
In response to this threat, the Government of Israel has taken various measures to combat terrorism.
One of them is the treatment of terrorists who kidnap their own nationals, a common form of terrorist attack in Israel, and kidnappers often hold their victims hostage for political or monetary gain.
The Government of Israel has been taking a strong stance against such acts, which it considers to be a serious threat to Israel's national security and must be combated.
Israel's treatment of terrorists who kidnap its own nationals
Israel's treatment of terrorists who kidnap its own nationals includes the following:
Military strikes
The Government of Israel believed that the best way to deal with terrorists was to strike militarily, and if terrorists kidnapped Israeli nationals, it would take a series of measures to free the hostages and fight the terrorists.
For example, in 2006, the Israeli government launched a war in Lebanon in response to the abduction of Israeli soldiers by the Lebanese Allah.
Special forces operations
The Israeli government also has a secret weapon, which is special forces, and if terrorists kidnap Israeli nationals, the Israeli government will send special forces to conduct covert operations, rescue hostages, and arrest or kill terrorists.
The Government of Israel has repeatedly dispatched special forces to conduct similar operations to rescue abducted Israeli nationals.
The most famous of these was Operation Antonio Arias in 1976, in which Israeli special forces successfully rescued hostages taken hostages from terrorists in Uganda and destroyed their bases.
Exchange prisoners
In some cases, the Israeli government also considers exchanging prisoners with terrorists, a practice that is internationally controversial because it may motivate terrorists to commit more kidnappings.
However, the Government of Israel believes that the exchange of prisoners is a way to protect Israeli nationals, as it ensures the safety of the abductees and allows the release of hostages held by terrorists.
In 2011, for example, the Israeli government released more than 1,000 Palestinian prisoners in exchange for the freedom of kidnapped Israeli soldier Gild Shalit.
Prosecution and imprisonment
If terrorists were caught and accused of kidnapping Israeli nationals, the Israeli Government would prosecute and imprison them, and Israeli law made kidnapping a crime and the perpetrators punished.
Under Israeli law, the maximum penalty for kidnapping is the death penalty, and the Israeli government has repeatedly dealt with terrorists in this way to warn others against similar acts.
Provisions of international law
Abduction is a crime under international humanitarian law and international human rights law, which prohibits any form of violence, including terrorism and kidnapping.
International human rights law, on the other hand, states that everyone has the right not to be subjected to unlawful detention and humiliation, and if a person is unlawfully abducted, it is a violation of human rights.
However, international law does not specify how terrorists and kidnappers are treated, as the way terrorists and kidnappers are treated differently in different countries and this approach tends to vary according to the needs of different situations.
Thus, the Israeli Government's approach to terrorists who kidnap its own nationals is not entirely consistent with international law, but its emphasis is on protecting the security and interests of its own nationals.
Opposing voices
However, the Israeli Government's approach was not without controversy, with some believing that its actions violated human rights and international law.
conclusion
The Israeli Government's practices in dealing with terrorists who kidnap their own nationals are controversial and, although they may not be fully consistent with international law and human rights law, they are intended to ensure the safety and interests of Israeli nationals.
The practice of exchanging prisoners may be more controversial because it may motivate terrorists to commit more kidnappings, but in some cases, exchanging prisoners is the only way to ensure the safety of the abductees.
bibliography
1. GUO Junrong, & ZHANG Yingying. (2016). Research on Israel's counter-terrorism policy[J]. Studies in International Law and International Relations, 1, 110-119.
2、Lippman, M. (2001). Israel and the Politics of Anti-Terrorism Strategies[M]. New York: Columbia University Press.
3、Kretzmer, D. (2002). Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defence? [J]. European Journal of International Law, 13(2), 227-240.
