#头条创作挑战赛 #
If someone asks, why does the Education Bureau recruit teachers every year? And the Education Bureau's answer must be, no. But is there really a shortage of teachers to the point where they have to be recruited in large numbers every year? This is clearly a false proposition.
Even if there are young people who choose to leave after entering the ranks of teachers, the number can be said to be very small. If not many new teachers have left, why do teachers keep hiring?
Among them, the most important is that education is in a serious situation where people float around, and many people, despite standing in a position, are not willing to do things, but push things to others to do. This should be present in many schools. Some netizens posted on social platforms: Our school, including the principal, vice principal, office director, and general affairs director, are all like this, all of them have not attended classes at the age of 53, and they have never come to school. Arrange two sub-courses, all of which are given to them by front-line teachers. Including the middle level of the school, only two sub-courses are taken.
This is an indisputable fact. Let's look at the Education Bureau, which used to have only about 10 people, but now, there are 50 or 60 people in small counties. An education bureau has more people than a secondary school, so where should so many people crowd there? Not because of anything else, but those who do things are seconded, and the official personnel are almost all handshakers - many people are probably still shouting, there are fewer people?
You don't see that these people don't go to class anymore and don't have much to do, but they are many times better than front-line teachers. No, one teacher posted on social media:
My friend's husband, who works as a vice principal at a middle school, is fifty-five years old and no longer goes to work.
Friends said that the school is like this, when the principal reaches the age of fifty-five, the position becomes the superintendent, and he has to withdraw from the school's leadership team. If there is something at school, call to inform you and go again, and you don't have to go to school if you have nothing to do. I asked, how often do I go to school? Friends said that some people only go once or twice a semester, and some people go often, whether they go or not, the salary is quite a lot, and the treatment is not lacking.
There is incense, and I began to enjoy blessings at such a young age.
At the age of 55, there is no need to think about school affairs, and there is no need to attend classes, as long as you occasionally go to school symbolically for a semester. This life is still leisurely, and even if it is like this, do nothing, or take the salary, pay a lot, this life is not happy, I have to be anxious with him.
A vice principal, who does nothing now, has a lot of money, is he also embarrassed? However, he also has his own grievances, that is, he withdrew because the school wanted to make room for others - he was also making sacrifices for the school.
I retired from the front line, do you still want me to go to the front line of teaching? I worked hard for the school and sweated, are you still using me as a cow at this time?
Principals naturally have to take these factors into account – this is the triumph of human favor over system.
And front-line teachers are naturally indignant about this. As a vice principal, at the age of 55, he can not go to work, and there should be no shortage of the same, and the teacher, even at the age of 60, he cannot leave the post, and many teachers are still full of workload. With such a comparison, which teacher would be envious and jealous?
In such a situation, how much enthusiasm can front-line teachers have. You get the highest salary, but you don't have to do anything, and the teachers on the front line are tired and tired like a dog, and the salary package is less than half of the vice principal. Isn't this the typical thing that is better to do than not to do, and not to do it is better to be trick-or-treating? Who wants to work more?
There are such bad examples in the past, I am afraid that there are not many people who want to teach with their hearts! Being a front-line teacher is hard and tiring, and where is it comfortable and affordable to be an official. As a result, many people's minds are no longer on teaching, and everyone wants to squeeze into the middle level.
And if you can't squeeze it, naturally you won't be convinced, they can get on, why can't they themselves, Lao Tzu can't make you happy. You want me to do this, Lao Tzu, why should I listen to you? One person and one trumpet, each blowing its own tune, and even some people simply chose to report, that is, to make you uneasy. In this way, the school cannot be managed, and the consequences are unimaginable!
If the vice principal is no longer in office, can it be that he has become a grand master, that is, he enjoys blessings, which is obviously illogical. But this is widespread. This is one of the reasons why there are many teachers, but teachers are recruited every year. And the emergence of such a situation often leads to the aggravation of contradictions within the school, so that the school is passive in management, which is even more than worth the loss, isn't it?
Dear reader, what do you want to say about the fact that the vice principal took a back seat at the age of 55 and did nothing, but the salary and benefits package is nothing? Welcome to leave a message and discuss.
[I am Butterfly Flower Rain Education, focusing on current affairs and the latest educational trends, and I like to express my thoughts and thoughts in words. Like my friends, please follow me: Butterfly Flower Rain Talk Education】