laitimes

Late at 22 o'clock CBA hot clash, Du Feng protested for 2 minutes of thunder, referee No. 39: No misjudgment

author:Shaogawa said

Text/Shaochuan

CBA clashed at 22 o'clock in the middle of the night, Du Feng protested for 2 minutes and jumped like thunder, referee No. 39: I didn't misjudge

The CBA has played out a fiery conflict again this week, and there has been a major controversial miscalculation that is somewhat rather speechless.

Late at 22 o'clock CBA hot clash, Du Feng protested for 2 minutes of thunder, referee No. 39: No misjudgment
Late at 22 o'clock CBA hot clash, Du Feng protested for 2 minutes of thunder, referee No. 39: No misjudgment

In the 30th round of the focus battle, Guangdong team away against Guangsha team, Guangdong finally lost 90:93 to Guangsha three consecutive wins were ended, with three and a half points left in the final quarter of the game, around 22 o'clock, Guangdong team had the opportunity to try to narrow the gap, tie the score and hold the suspense of the game, but was directly killed by the referee.

Late at 22 o'clock CBA hot clash, Du Feng protested for 2 minutes of thunder, referee No. 39: No misjudgment

At that time, it was 3 minutes and 25 seconds, and Zhao Rui was interfered with by Hu Jinqiu during the process of breaking through the bottom layup with the ball, but the referee thought that the ball was not a interference ball and did not blow a penalty. Judging from the slow-motion replay, when Zhao Rui went to the layup, the ball had already hit the board first, and then showed a falling situation, and the ball hit the rebound when Hu Jinqiu was capped, which is equivalent to saying that it hit the rebound twice, and according to the rules, it is obviously a jamming ball.

Late at 22 o'clock CBA hot clash, Du Feng protested for 2 minutes of thunder, referee No. 39: No misjudgment
Late at 22 o'clock CBA hot clash, Du Feng protested for 2 minutes of thunder, referee No. 39: No misjudgment

Du Feng immediately protested to the referee, the referee terminated the game, but then the referee refused to watch the replay, the No. 39 referee, CBA famous whistle Yang Hongfeng clearly told Du Feng that there was no problem with this ball decision, there was no need to watch the replay. Du Feng was so angry that he lasted for more than 120 seconds, always protesting with the referee, but the scene where the referee refused to compromise was quite speechless.

Late at 22 o'clock CBA hot clash, Du Feng protested for 2 minutes of thunder, referee No. 39: No misjudgment

According to the interpretation of the rules, in fact, if it touches the board, it must be a interference ball. So this ball is undoubtedly a problem ball, because the referee did not blow the penalty to let the game continue, so then Cummings on the Guangsha team used the ball to shoot the three-pointer, and the gap was directly widened from the original 83:78 to 8 points, and the suspense of the game was completely lost.

Late at 22 o'clock CBA hot clash, Du Feng protested for 2 minutes of thunder, referee No. 39: No misjudgment

For such a result, fans protested one after another, and many people on social media supported Du Feng, believing that there was no problem with the Guangdong team, and there was a serious problem with the referee's decision. Everyone said: "When you hit the board, it must be a jamming ball, by the way, the CBA's playback and camera switching and even broadcast technology are too poor, look at the provincial league, learn hard." "This ball is really critical, the obvious interference ball is not given in the end, and the momentum behind directly collapses."

Late at 22 o'clock CBA hot clash, Du Feng protested for 2 minutes of thunder, referee No. 39: No misjudgment

In fact, for the Guangdong team, whether they can win this game is secondary, the most important thing is that the team has begun to rebuild after failing to win the championship last season. In the process of rebuilding, encountering last season's runner-up Guangsha team is indeed a very good opportunity to train troops, if you can overcome the opponent, at least entangle with the opponent to the end, it is a good boost to the morale of the team, but all this was ruthlessly stifled by the referee's misjudgment, and the CBA ignored this, and there was no formal expression at all, which is the most chilling.

Read on