laitimes

Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision

author:Qian Sanwan Cat Research Laboratory

Hello everyone, I am three fat, continue to watch the news today, this time it is European.

First of all, remind that this news is not very objective, the author is European and has a subjective tendency to blow Europe.

The screenshot is the original text, and the remarks are the comments of Sanfat.

Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision

Note: Not objective, in fact, there are a lot of extreme negative news about pet food all over the world, see the end of the article.

Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision

Note: In fact, legal provisions and enforcement are two different things, such as the FDA banning the use of 4D meat, but in practice it is still used.

For example, California's pet food regulations, although strict, are almost not enforced.

This question this American journalist explained:

Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision

Note: This part says that the FDA and CVM in the United States are responsible for regulation, and AAFCO is only responsible for providing nutritional requirements.

Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision
Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision

Note: This part is to say, 1. Pet raw materials in the United States do not need to be approved in advance, but additives do.

2. The implementation of laws and regulations mainly depends on random inspections of factories and complaints from consumers and veterinarians.

3) At the state level, each state requires pet food sold in the state to be registered first, and then may check the label, or conduct random quality testing, and may investigate the factory if it is complained.

4. How to write the label is also the responsibility of the FDA, but the nutritional basis is provided.

(Note that this section all says "maybe.") )

Here need to be reminded that this part of the content is not completely correct, in fact, the regulation in the United States is not so good, and the implementation of each state is very different, there are completely unregulated and not enforced, or refer to this article:

Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision
Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision

Note: This part is Canadian regulation and can summarize the following information:

1. Although Canada has some regulations, they are not enforced.

2. Pet food is produced and sold in Canada and does not require inspection and verification.

3. If exporting abroad, the manufacturer only needs to provide documents to the regulatory authority to be allowed to export. If the documents provided by the manufacturer are falsified information, there is no penalty.

4. The label will not be strictly enforced by anyone.

The unregulated nature of Canada has been exposed again, exactly as described in this North American news:

Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision
Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision

Note: It seems that the EU is doing a good job, but it should be noted that this news is written by Europeans, there is an element of glorification, and it will be more obvious at the end of the article.

The biggest of these is the phrase "enforced by local authorities".

In fact, the examples of the United States and Canada tell us that there are regulations that can not be enforced, and the euphemism is called "discretion in enforcement";

Or the intensity of implementation varies greatly from region to region.

Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision

Note: This part is a description of China's regulation, this article was published in May 2020, at this time, the current domestic regulations are much higher than this news description, obviously this European author does not know about this.

But the executive level is true, as the news says, no.

Sanfat has heard that the relevant departments of Zhejiang Province will go to random inspections of factories in the province, but the items and significance of such sampling inspections are not clear.

In addition, the news says that there is no punishment, in fact, there are penalties, but they are really not heavy, and there are clear standards in Document No. 20.

The requirements for labeling are indeed not mandatory, because the national standard of cat food is GB/T, and the national standard with T is recommended, not mandatory, and can not be complied with, see this article for details:

But in fact, most of the grain is observed, because it is too easy to achieve.

However, the three raw materials of fresh meat, meat powder, and frozen meat are still written more indiscriminately;

Or the brand side does not know exactly what is added, the reason:

It needs to be emphasized here that from the underlying logic, imported grain cannot avoid these problems.

Compared with the supervision of pet food in Europe, the United States, China and Canada, Canada has no supervision

Note: This is the end of the news, the news author summed up again, saying that Canada's lax regulation, the United States' weak supervision, the strict regulation of pet food, and the European Union must lead it...

Ou Blow was exposed like this...

News Summary:

1. This European author believes that the regulatory order of countries is the European Union> the United States> Canada = China.

2. It once again proves that there is no regulation in Canada.

3. This author has a certain tendency to blow the European Union, and the part of the EU cannot be fully believed.

Overseas News Column:

1. [Comment on a piece of news] Pet food raw materials secretly leaked on New York highways

2. [North American News Review] Canadian Pet Food Inspection Agency employees broke the news that Canada has no supervision

Other World Pet Food Reviews:

Imported grain pit prevention guide 2.0: Global map gun, restore the real status of imported grain

【Small talk】Why are there no good cat food in Japan and South Korea? And why is imported cat food concentrated in North America, Australia and Europe?

Amateur, low-level,-like WDJ recommendations, 59 recommended brands in 2021 full text translation and review (Part 2/3)

Read on