Regarding the education of children, it can be said that the whole world pays great attention to the topic, we can not only limit ourselves to our own concepts and thinking, but also need to listen to the outside voice, see what people are doing, what people are saying, in terms of learning to complement each other, we should not have any resistance, because learning is not shameful, backwardness is shame.
Japanese Nobel Prize winner Shuji Nakamura once put forward the idea that the East Asian education model is a waste of children's lives. Such a statement can be said to be very extreme, but is there any truth to it? This is where we need to think, the world should tolerate any voice, including opposition and radical voices, but how to think and listen, this is your wisdom, not avoid it, talk about tiger color change.
Shuji Nakamura has been a person who does not love to study and does not do business since he was a child, and because of this, he was admitted to a third-rate university, although his academic performance was mediocre, but he loved physics very much, and finally with this hobby and love, he won the Nobel Prize in Physics, of course, the process and experience in this is by no means as simple as I say, but let's make a long story short, anyway, that's what it means.
It is precisely after winning this award that he has the qualification to talk about the topic of education, because only at this time, his words have the most weight, and it is also under such an opportunity that he expressed his views on education, precisely because of such an experience, he is very anti-sensory education, because such an education model, will erase many talented children, because many children are not all-round, he may only be a talent in a certain aspect, but it is precisely because of test-taking education, Let such a group of children not develop, so that they are buried.
Therefore, in the eyes of Nakamura Shuji, East Asian education is rigid, every day to constantly endorse and solve problems and repeat, this mechanical behavior, in his eyes is to erase the child's life, and finally to the score of this solidified judgment as the standard, just the evaluation of memory and mechanical behavior, he suggested to strengthen children's quality education, let children think and answer questions freely, rather than rigid endorsement and over and over again to solve problems, this kind of instilled talents, can only be regarded as talents with good memory, Without your own ideas and thinking, how can we talk about creativity?
What do you think of Shuji Nakamura's remarks?