laitimes

In 1955, employees in the workshop of Aris Chalmers Company in the United States were busy. The odd-looking armored vehicle they were fitting was not a tank or an armored transport vehicle

author:Wang Yanan said

In 1955, employees in the workshop of Aris Chalmers Company in the United States were busy. The strange-looking armored vehicle they were installing was not a tank or an armored transport vehicle, but a very characteristic anti-tank weapon, the M50 "Antus" anti-tank combat vehicle. Judging from the bare hull on the picture, this car is basically not prepared to install a special high-bore pressure gun, in fact, its standard weapon is six 106 mm recoilless guns hanging on both sides of the hull. Although it is possible to fire 6 consecutive armor-breaking shells or broken armor shells in a short period of time, the strong flames when fired not only form a large death zone behind the hull, but also allow the opponent to find out the launch location of the vehicle without effort. Moreover, such a thin hull armor could not withstand the blow of the opponent's shells. The anti-tank combat effectiveness of "Antus" was not good, but it became a weapon of anti-fortification in the Vietnam War, and its ability to destroy houses and walls was excellent.

In 1955, employees in the workshop of Aris Chalmers Company in the United States were busy. The odd-looking armored vehicle they were fitting was not a tank or an armored transport vehicle
In 1955, employees in the workshop of Aris Chalmers Company in the United States were busy. The odd-looking armored vehicle they were fitting was not a tank or an armored transport vehicle
In 1955, employees in the workshop of Aris Chalmers Company in the United States were busy. The odd-looking armored vehicle they were fitting was not a tank or an armored transport vehicle
In 1955, employees in the workshop of Aris Chalmers Company in the United States were busy. The odd-looking armored vehicle they were fitting was not a tank or an armored transport vehicle
In 1955, employees in the workshop of Aris Chalmers Company in the United States were busy. The odd-looking armored vehicle they were fitting was not a tank or an armored transport vehicle
In 1955, employees in the workshop of Aris Chalmers Company in the United States were busy. The odd-looking armored vehicle they were fitting was not a tank or an armored transport vehicle

Read on