#娱乐聚焦 #
On the evening of August 28, pipa musician Liu Qingyao posted a video on Weibo saying that Liu Yu's son's semi-masked stage performance in the program "The Masked Dancer" was suspected of infringing on his original work "Warrior Lanling Ensemble" and would sue Jiangsu Satellite TV, iQiyi, Youku, Shanghai Canxing Productions, and Liu Yu for infringement. The incident aroused concern and rushed to the hot search.
Before the hot search, Liu Qingyao had twice posted a video discussing this infringement. She was very angry and dissatisfied with the masquerade's unauthorized use and editing of her own original works, and said that she wanted to defend her rights to the end. But at the beginning, she did not list Liu Yu as the object of her rights protection, and she also said that "artists are all influenced by the program group."
At present, "The Masked Dance King" and Shanghai Canstar Production Company have not issued a statement explaining the infringement dispute, and many netizens have also left messages on relevant accounts, hoping to resolve the infringement dispute in a timely manner and give an explanation to the original author.
Related: Liu Qingyao v. "Masquerade Dancer" track infringement Liu Yufang has deleted the video.
This is not the first time Liu Qingyao has spoken out for herself. Since she has not received a corresponding apology and resolution, Liu Qingyao had to release a video again to respond to the matter.
At the same time, she mentioned that when she first released the rights protection video, she did not take Liu Yu as a defendant, but the other party's fans have been abusing themselves in various languages in private messages, so she chose to send Liu Yu to the defendant's seat.
As a creator who loves music, each work is his own painstaking effort, which is also the reason why Liu Qingyao chose to stand up and defend her rights.
Liu Qingyao said that the infringing subject did not publicly apologize, and Liu Yu did not delete the infringing video. The compensation plan proposed by Canstar on its own initiative is unreasonable, so it will continue to sue.
