laitimes

After Dismantling the Glory mobile phone in Japan, it was found that China's core technology was replaced by the United States, and the academician warned that it was useless?

This is the head of the article

The industrial chain behind the smart phone involves a wide range of people, and every manufacturer enters it inevitably to link tracks with the global industry, using components and core technologies from home and abroad.

There is nothing wrong with this in itself, but if the dependence on the uncontrollable industrial chain overseas is large, it will make many historical events repeat itself. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the level of domestic autonomy to a certain extent.

After the dismantling of the Honor mobile phone by Japanese institutions, it was found that the localization rate was greatly reduced, and the proportion of parts used in the United States increased by 29%, in other words, China's core technology was replaced by the United States. Do domestic manufacturers have a choice? In contrast, while Huawei is carrying out various self-developed technologies, how can domestic manufacturers align with Huawei?

After Dismantling the Glory mobile phone in Japan, it was found that China's core technology was replaced by the United States, and the academician warned that it was useless?

The proportion of core technologies at home and abroad in Honor mobile phones

After the glory independence, the life was still good, the market share quickly recovered, set up its own official website, and completed the comprehensive layout of online and offline sales channels. After a glorious effort, I finally got the reward I deserved.

According to data from Canalys statistics, in the first quarter of this year Chinese mainland smartphone market glory won the first place, with shipments of up to 15 million units, with a growth rate of more than 205%. OPPO, Apple, Vivo, and Xiaomi ranked second and fifth.

After Dismantling the Glory mobile phone in Japan, it was found that China's core technology was replaced by the United States, and the academician warned that it was useless?

Looking closely at the proportion of data for annual growth rates, except for Honor and Apple, which are positive growth, the rest of the manufacturers are declining. Among the few growing manufacturers, Honor rode the dust and won the first place in the smartphone market in Chinese mainland the first quarter of this year with an absolute advantage of 205%.

This is undoubtedly good news, and Glory has finally found the right path. But at the same time, another piece of news came, which gave the outside world a new perspective. This news is related to the proportion of core technologies at home and abroad in Honor mobile phones.

After Dismantling the Glory mobile phone in Japan, it was found that China's core technology was replaced by the United States, and the academician warned that it was useless?

Some Japanese institutions dismantled the Honor X30 mobile phone, estimated the value of the parts in it, analyzed the product analysis and the source of the parts brand, and finally came up with the data on the proportion of domestic and foreign parts.

The data shows that the U.S. component accounts for 38.5% of the total cost, and this data is still 9.6% in 2020, an increase of about 29% compared with the two-year data. In addition, the proportion of parts from Chinese suppliers fell by 27% to 10.2%.

After Dismantling the Glory mobile phone in Japan, it was found that China's core technology was replaced by the United States, and the academician warned that it was useless?

Do domestic manufacturers have a choice?

Parts and components in the United States have risen, and the proportion of parts and components in China has declined. The main baseband, chip processors come from Qualcomm, and important materials also have more contact with the US supply chain.

The hardware level is still the same, not to mention the software level, Honor also announced that it has regained Google GMS services, which means that Honor has obtained the ticket to land in overseas markets.

It is not difficult to analyze the data to know that the influence of the US supply chain is continuing to be reflected in domestic manufacturers. But can this blame domestic manufacturers? Or is there a choice? Is It true that Academician Ni Guangnan's warning is useless?

After Dismantling the Glory mobile phone in Japan, it was found that China's core technology was replaced by the United States, and the academician warned that it was useless?

Ni Guangnan, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, has clearly said that practice has proved that core technologies cannot be bought or exchanged. Therefore, Ni Guangnan also called for attention to the research and development of domestic technologies.

Now domestic manufacturers are impacting the high-end market, and entering the high-end naturally to choose the best accessories in the industry, using the top baseband, processor, RF front-end, precision structural parts and so on.

These technology products happen to be foreign suppliers occupying a leading position in the industry, such as Qualcomm's Snapdragon chip, which has always been the first choice for high-end mobile phone manufacturers. Even if there is a heat problem, it can only be accepted by enhancing the heat dissipation function.

After Dismantling the Glory mobile phone in Japan, it was found that China's core technology was replaced by the United States, and the academician warned that it was useless?

Therefore, the increase in the proportion of foreign parts and components is not necessarily the responsibility of domestic manufacturers, which also has a certain relationship with the supply chain. If there are better choices and better products than foreign suppliers, perhaps the proportion of domestic manufacturers using domestic technologies will also increase.

Although it is related to the level difference in the supply chain, domestic manufacturers cannot use this as a reason to shirk. Some manufacturers will also choose foreign suppliers to cooperate, but the core technology must be self-developed, and important products must be grasped in their hands.

In addition to holding brand trademarks, some manufacturers can participate in the supply chain, but also develop customized systems based on Android, and form complete smart phone products with the help of the industrial chain. But what is the difference between this way of making mobile phones and the "OEM machine" of decades ago?

After Dismantling the Glory mobile phone in Japan, it was found that China's core technology was replaced by the United States, and the academician warned that it was useless?

How do domestic manufacturers look up to Huawei?

The proportion of core technologies, the results of self-developed technologies, and whether the patent system is solid are all key factors that determine the increase in the autonomy rate. For example, the P50 released by Huawei is considered by the industry to be a mobile phone with the highest localization rate.

The key cores of the baseband, processor, and operating system are all independently developed by Huawei. Behind the core suppliers most of the domestic enterprises, the screen from BOE, the glass cover from Lens Technology, and BYD also provide a large number of precision structural parts, assembly, batteries and other services.

After Dismantling the Glory mobile phone in Japan, it was found that China's core technology was replaced by the United States, and the academician warned that it was useless?

This may be the real practice of Academician Ni Guangnan's words. So how do domestic manufacturers align with Huawei? Some people may refute that Huawei is not also using foreign components, and the mobile phones released now use Snapdragon processors.

Having said that, understand that Huawei's situation is different from other manufacturers. In this case, Huawei can still firmly develop its own research and unshakable independent innovation route. This is also where domestic manufacturers should look at Huawei, there is no problem in using foreign supplier technology, but it is necessary to improve the strength of independent control in the core technology.

After Dismantling the Glory mobile phone in Japan, it was found that China's core technology was replaced by the United States, and the academician warned that it was useless?

Write at the end

The market share of Honor mobile phones continues to increase, and the proportion of technology from abroad is also rising. To understand that the minds of some people abroad have been very active, in order to avoid the recurrence of history, perhaps like Huawei, holding the core technology, there is a standing capital to make money.

What do you think about that? Welcome to leave a message and forward.

This is the end of the article

Read on