Text/Water Clear
Shanghai eliminated the Shenzhen game, Wang Zhelin crashed into Gu Quan in the last 32 seconds, indirectly helping Liu Zheng get the offensive rebound to complete the basket became the most important turning point in the game, and today's referee report pointed out that this is a missed judgment, so why didn't the bottom line's teacher Yan Jun and the right sideline teacher Han Xu not blow? We look at the details.
Wang Zhelin led Shanghai to eliminate Shenzhen
He Xining's three-pointer chased the score to 81-83, Shanghai attacked, missed the judgment screen came: Wang Zhelin forcibly threw the ball to the basket, and then directly rushed to the paint area, after crashing into Gu Quan, Liu Zheng got the offensive rebound to complete the basket, when the bottom line of Yan Jun teacher, the right line of the Han Xu teacher did not whistle, why is this? Let's look at the details:
Wang Zhelin rushed to grab the offensive rebound and crashed into The Full Referee Feng Blow
First, Wang Zhelin rushed to the paint area from the right side, and his huge body crashed into Gu Quan from behind, almost blocking the perspective of the two referees, and the two were a bit unclear, which was one of them.
Liu Zheng was pushed down by Sarinjet instantly
Second, we look back at the situation in slow motion: Wang Zhelin held the ball in the right arc before the foul, Liu Zheng wanted to come over to block the demolition, was directly pushed to the ground by Salinger's left hand, Li Chunjiang's guidance pointed to the incident and questioned Han Xu's teacher, and then Wang Zhelin retreated to shoot three points, Salin jie pounced from inside the three-point line to outside the three-point line, the two bodies had lateral contact in the air, and as a result, the two fouls were suspected of not blowing, and Wang Zhelin rushed to attack the rebound foul and could not blow the penalty, after all, the referee should try to keep the scale of the penalty consistent, not to mention, Throughout the game, the referee's decision is actually favorable to Shenzhen, why is it so defined? See the details:
Third, the referee's penalty for the whole game is beneficial to Shenzhen.
Ren Junwei debuted in the first quarter for 6 minutes and 4 fouls, 2 fouls in the second quarter, and 6 fouls in 17 minutes and was punished, among them, Gu Quan attacked and rebounded and fell to the ground, Ren Junwei committed a foul; He Xining grabbed the ground and fell to the ground, Ren Junwei made a second foul; in the second quarter, Shen Zijie and Salingjie each made a foul, note that his third offense, squeezed through Shen Zijie to prevent Gu Quan from three points, he did not touch Gu Quan, and as a result, he was blown foul, and then as Tu Gu Quan broke through, he leaned forward, Ren Junwei made the fourth foul, and these two fouls are debatable.
When Li Chunjiang instructed Ren Junwei to commit the fourth offense, he confronted Teacher Yan Jun and asked, "If you push your stomach forward (body language expression), you can cause a foul!" To tell the truth, it is really rare to directly play the third core of Shanghai in the 17th minute, usually as a star, you will enjoy some "star whistle" treatment.
Franklin was blown foul instantly
In the third quarter of 7 minutes and 30 seconds, as shown in the picture, Franklin arc top holding the ball breakthrough, Bai Haotian's entanglement, Booker's last moment of blocking also has a foul, the result of the referee did not blow the penalty foul; the moment Bai Haotian got the ball, Franklin rushed to form a scramble for the ball after the two sides fell to the ground, Yu Wei teacher whistled to punish Franklin for foul, Li Chunjiang finally could not hold back, fire.
Li Chunjiang was angry instantly
As shown in the picture, Li Chunjiang directly walked to the technical desk, pointed to the scene of the incident and questioned loudly, and was also punished by Han Xu for a personal technical foul.
Is the above situation only a one-sided analysis of the blowing penalty that is "beneficial to Shenzhen"? Let's take a look at the real-world data:
In the first quarter of the game, shanghai team 6 fouls, of which Ren Junwei alone 4 times, and the number of fouls 6-0, only began to blow the Shenzhen team foul, the number of fouls in this section is 6-7; in the second quarter of the game, Shanghai team 6 more fouls, Shenzhen team 4 times, of which Ren Junwei 6 fouls left the field; in the third quarter of the game, Shanghai team 11 fouls in a single quarter, Shenzhen team only 4 times.
In contrast to the fouls formed in the first three quarters, Shanghai team had 8 more 23-15 and 19-28 free throws, shanghai team fell behind 9 times. Even in the final quarter of the game, the Shenzhen team 10 fouls are quite high, while the Shanghai team also has as many as 8 times. In the end, the number of fouls committed by the two teams, Shanghai team 31-25 still has 6 more times, the number of free throws, Shanghai team 30-37 still trailed 7 times.
At this point, it is not difficult to understand why Wang Zhelin did not blow the penalty for Gu Quan's foul to grab the rebound, as mentioned above, Wang Zhelin's referee's perspective when he fouled was not the best, and may be blocked; and before this foul, the two defenses of the Shenzhen team also had fouls, so that the referee was slightly hesitant about this blowing penalty; the most important point is that the referee's penalty in the whole game has actually been beneficial to Shenzhen, and this penalty is what the anecdotal "looking for a whistle" is just.
Finally, looking at these two games, Shenzhen has the opportunity to win, but the whole team did not seize the opportunity, from the team's tactical quality to the role of the stars at key moments, as well as the coach's on-the-spot adjustment, Shanghai's promotion is well deserved.