laitimes

Which side do you stand on in this "Feng Gong" dispute?

The full text is 1792 words, and the reading time is expected to be 4 minutes.

Recently, several air-distance dialogues between former international Footballer Feng Xiaoting and CPPCC member Gong Hanlin have become the focus of public opinion, and relevant people inside and outside the football circle have also expressed their views.

Which side do you stand on in this "Feng Gong" dispute?

The dialogue originated from a passage about Chinese football in an interview with the People's Political Consultative Conference Daily during the two sessions, when Gong Hanlin, an actor in the rap troupe of the China Broadcasting Arts Troupe and a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, was interviewed by the People's Political Consultative Conference Daily. Gong Hanlin said that advanced figures and model workers are completely sacrificing small families for everyone, and they are selfless dedication when the country needs it most. Gong Hanlin said: "Let's compare and look at those corrupt officials, a person's corruption of tens of millions of billions; and then look at our flooded 'rice circle', (public figures) earn tens of millions, hundreds of millions, and still evade taxes; and then look at the income of some industries, for example, a football team, the annual income of three million, five million or even tens of millions, the court did not see them score, completely humiliating to the Chinese." Although Gong Hanlin also responded in the interview since then, saying that his intention was to encourage the promotion of labor models, not to blame Chinese football, but his interview was widely disseminated on various platforms and triggered more discussion.

Which side do you stand on in this "Feng Gong" dispute?

A few days after Gong Hanlin's interview video spread on the Internet, Feng Xiaoting, the former captain of the Chinese men's football team, updated a dynamic on his personal social platform, in the face of the netizen comments asking whether he was about to retire, Feng Xiaoting gave a reply of "retiring, giving way to Gong Hanlin", which also aroused great concern from public opinion, once on the hot search, and triggered some football media people to forward comments, many of which questioned Gong Hanlin as an outsider who did not understand the ball. Soon, Gong Hanlin also responded on his personal social platform, this time using the micro-comedy short video that he is better at.

In the face of Gong Hanlin's short video response, Feng Xiaoting quickly spoke again, on March 14, he posted a long article of more than 2,000 words on his personal social platform, and then recorded a short video to express his attitude towards Chinese football and its public opinion environment, although he opened with a statement that he was "not in response to Gong Hanlin's teacher, just talk about his own heart at this moment", but Feng Xiaoting's long article is still regarded by the outside world as another escalation of this air debate. In this article released by Feng Xiaoting, the World Cup match between Japan and Belgium is cited as an example. In the 2018 World Cup in Russia, Japan was pulled twice by Belgium in 6 minutes with a 2-0 lead, and finally suffered an opponent's kill in stoppage time, in order to summarize the defeat, the Japanese side analyzed the 14-second video collected by 28 cameras at the time, and invited a number of football insiders, including the main players of both sides, to review and discuss. After telling this story, Feng Xiaoting took the many defeats of Chinese football as an example, pointing out the criticism and accusations from the outside world, which no longer helped Chinese football.

Which side do you stand on in this "Feng Gong" dispute?

For this "Feng Gong" dispute, the official microblog of the People's Network Commentary Department took "Feng Xiaoting, can not be too glassy" as the title, saying that "playing iron also needs to be hard, if you can't speak with results on the court, in the field of public opinion, no matter how many articles you send, you won't get much sympathy, and even trigger more accusations, and you won't lose more." For everyone involved in the Chinese men's football team, the first priority at present is to really reflect on how they have changed, face the next two games, come up with what attitude, and change everyone's view. Otherwise, the lowest point of the Chinese men's football team may not be in the end, and there may be many people waiting to see the 'joke of the men's football team' and waiting to harvest a wave of traffic. ”

Which side do you stand on in this "Feng Gong" dispute?

In fact, this topic not only appears in the football circle, but even Yao Ming, the leader of Chinese basketball, has also faced questions. The answer he gave was also simple.

Former international Li Yi has a similar view on the matter. Li Yi said: Since ancient times, the winner is the king, the loser is the coward, what else can Vietnam say if it loses? Want others to respect your industry can only rely on everyone's efforts to do a better job in this industry, now this industry has indeed reached the most difficult time, to borrow a sentence man chew it chew it!

On the evening of March 15, Feng Xiaoting's teammate Yang Xu of the Shanghai Shenhua team released a video. He said in the video, "Feng Xiaoting and Yang Xu have been scolded, but we are not numb yet. Everyone says that cooking is the original sin, but why is the effort of several generations of Chinese football in exchange for worse results than one generation? Only the establishment of a correct ecological environment and scientific youth training system for Chinese football is the core and the king. I implore everyone to scold us at the same time, but also willing to send their children to play football, but also willing to reflect with us, is the true love of the deep responsibility. In addition, Yang Xu also said that the deputies of the two sessions have an extremely heavy right to propose, and while raising questions, please conduct rigorous research and evaluation, come up with solutions, and use their rights carefully. Instead of using the right to propose, give yourself a chance to vent your emotions. (Note: Gong Hanlin's proposal is not aimed at Chinese football, and he uses "a certain team" in his statement.) )

Which side do you stand on in this "Feng Gong" dispute?

After the two sides made their positions clear, the focus of the debate was also very simple and clear. That is, gong Hanlin's representative, who does not have much professional opinion, is it qualified to question and be dissatisfied with Chinese football? As insiders, Feng Xiaoting and Yang Xu gave the answers that were obviously no. So, which of the two views of "dish is original sin" and "no voice without investigation" is more correct?

Read on