Dai Youqing/Beijing Youth Daily client
On May 18, a topic of 97 points in politics for college girls who were questioned about their fraudulent grades was on Weibo. At present, Xinxiang Engineering College and Tianren Postgraduate Examination Institution, which published relevant promotional tweets, have deleted their drafts. On May 18, the staff of the Propaganda Department of Xinxiang Institute of Engineering told a reporter from Beijing Youth Daily that the candidate usually has excellent character and learning in school, and the results of the postgraduate examination are reported to the teacher after the results of the postgraduate examination come out, but after paying attention to the doubts of netizens, the school set up an investigation team to further investigate and found that there is indeed a problem with the results reported by the candidate, and the candidate has not been admitted to the graduate school at present.
On May 15, a post released by the official account of Xinxiang University of Engineering "Our school is a super god, and he scored 97 points in politics for postgraduate entrance examinations" aroused heated discussions among netizens. Many netizens questioned that 97 points in the political exam was too outrageous, and it was not a science subject, even if the multiple-choice questions were full marks, it was unlikely that only 3 points would be deducted for the subjective questions, and they suspected that the screenshot of the results was forged by the P picture. Some netizens analyzed that the total three digits in the screenshot of the normal postgraduate entrance examination results are aligned with the three digits of the professional code, but the candidate's score of 373 points is not aligned with the professional number code below.
In addition, according to the tweet of the WeChat public account of Tianren Education, a postgraduate examination institution, in the outstanding student award ceremony held by the institution on May 12, the candidate won the "Single Subject Star Scholarship" as a high-scoring student. On May 17, the promotional tweets of Xinxiang Institute of Engineering and Tianren Postgraduate Examination Agency about the candidate have been deleted. On May 18th, the staff of Tianren Postgraduate Examination Agency told a reporter from Beiqing Daily that the candidate did participate in the postgraduate examination training in the institution, and since the institution released a tweet to the outside world and issued a scholarship to the candidate, there must be a voucher and will not be sent randomly, and it is currently understood that the candidate's results are real. "The results of our external propaganda are all real, and if we delete the manuscript, we may be afraid that too much public opinion will cause adverse effects." Regarding the situation that the candidate's score was questioned, the staff member said that he would further understand the situation.
At the same time, the staff of the Propaganda Department of Xinxiang Engineering College told the reporter of Beiqing Daily that the candidate usually performs well in school, has excellent character and learning, and has won many scholarships and grants. After the results of the graduate school entrance examination came out, she reported to the teacher the results posted in the school's tweet. The main purpose of the school's tweet is to share the joy of students' success in the graduate school entrance examination and to share their experience in the graduate school entrance examination. After paying attention to the doubts of netizens, the school also contacted the student himself by phone to verify, and the student insisted that the results were true. "Because the graduate school entrance examination score inquiry system was closed at that time, and the students could not check the results again, we chose to trust the students at first. Later, there were more and more doubts, so we first retracted the manuscript and set up an investigation team to further investigate the matter. The staff member said that after investigation, there were indeed problems with the student's graduate school entrance examination results reported to the school, and the candidate was not admitted to graduate school at present. The school is still investigating the matter and will deal with the students involved accordingly.
This issue is edited by Xing Tan