The first game of the CBA finals between Liaoning and Xinjiang ended on May 16, and the Liaoning team kicked off with an easy victory.
But this victory is not only a game victory, but also the beginning of the MVP ranking controversy, because in the latest rankings, Fu Hao overwhelmed the stars with a super high rating, which sparked widespread discussion in the outside world.
The name Fu Hao may indeed be less eye-catching outside of Liaoning fans, but after the first game of the CBA finals, his name can be described as a swipe.
With a performance rating of 25.3, that's enough to catch people's eyes because it means that he did quite well in the game.
And this counterattack situation has made people have a lot of questions about the selection of MVP.
In the heated discussion caused by this topic, netizens began to express their opinions one after another.
Someone said: Fu Hao is really amazing this time, I never thought he would have such a big breakthrough before.
But does he really deserve MVP? I think Zhao Jiwei and Zhang Zhenlin are the mainstays of the team! This sentiment reflects the belief that the MVP should be played by a more well-known player on the team.
And some netizens have a different opinion: Don't look at Fu Hao, who is usually not so eye-catching, but he has contributed a lot to this game! His performance is really amazing, he is completely invisible MVP! They believe that Fu Hao's performance is well deserved, and the title of MVP should belong to him.
In the midst of such debates, some netizens began to come up with data to support their views.
Someone pointed out: Look at Fu Hao's data in this game, 29 points and 9 rebounds, 12 of 15! With such a performance, it's no wonder that you can't get the MVP!
Others retorted: But if you look at Zhao Jiwei's organizational ability, Zhang Zhenlin's scoring ability, they can bring different highlights to the team in every game.
Although Fu Hao performed well, the MVP should not only look at the offensive statistics, but also the contribution on the defensive end.
Such conversations and arguments have been going on on the web for a long time.
Some people think that the MVP should be the best player on the team, while others believe that the MVP should focus more on the overall contribution of the team.
The debate also reflects a divergent view of the MVP selection criteria.
This MVP ranking controversy sparked an in-depth discussion among netizens about the CBA selection mechanism.
Some believe that this controversy is not a momentary moment, but a concentrated explosion of long-standing problems in the CBA.
A netizen said: CBA's MVP selection mechanism really needs to be revisited.
This formula may be biased in favor of one type of player, more in favor of offensive players, and ignores the contribution of the defensive end.
He believes that this one-sidedness has led to players like Fu Hao standing out in the MVP rankings, while the contributions of other players on the team may be underestimated.
Another netizen said: That's right, the current selection mechanism is completely encouraging offensive players, ignoring those players who are unknown but put in great effort on the defensive end.
Can MVP only be the scoring champion? I think we should consider the contribution of the whole team rather than the one-sided pursuit of scoring statistics.
His remarks caused a response, and many netizens expressed their approval.
But there are also some netizens who have a different opinion, they believe that the MVP selection should indeed focus on the overall performance of the team, but the scoring ability is one of the most basic abilities of a player.
Fu Hao's outstanding performance in this game is undoubtedly one of the important reasons for his team's victory, so he should be duly recognized.
This view reflects a view of the diversity of the MVP selection process.
With the CBA finals in full swing, the Xinjiang team ushered in the challenge of adjusting its defensive strategy.
A fan said on social media: Fu Hao's performance in this game is too eye-catching, and the Xinjiang team will definitely focus on defending him in the next game.
This view was unanimously shared by other fans, who believed that Fu Hao had become an important scoring point for the Liaoning team and needed to tighten the restrictions on him.
However, there are some fans who have a different opinion.
Some people believe that you can't just focus on Fu Hao, Zhao Jiwei, Zhang Zhenlin and other players are also scoring weapons for the Liaoning team.
If we focus too much on limiting Fu Hao, it may give other players more room to play.
This analysis has struck a chord with some fans, who believe that the Xinjiang team needs to consider the opponent's tactical set-up more holistically.
For Fu Hao, the next game will be a chance to prove himself.
One fan said: Fu Hao performed well in this game, but he needs to prove his strength again in the next games to be able to convince people that he really deserves the title of MVP.
His words were agreed by other fans, and everyone expected Fu Hao to continue his good form and bring more victories to the team.
Looking back at the evaluation of Fu Hao on the Internet, Fu Hao has attracted attention not only because of his performance on the court, but also because of his physical condition and basketball talent.
From an early age, he showed enviable physical fitness and extremely high basketball talent.
Some fans commented on social media: Fu Hao's physical condition can be described as a natural basketball material, and like Wang Zhizhi, he has flexible and fast feet, which makes him very agile under the basket.
This praise for Fu Hao's physical fitness was unanimously endorsed by other fans, who all believed that Fu Hao's physical gifts were one of the important reasons for his outstanding performance on the court.
In addition to his excellent physical fitness, Fu Hao also showed consistent mid-range shooting and excellent rebounding ability.
One fan said: Fu Hao's mid-range shooting is very consistent, and he can score in this area almost every game, which helps the team a lot.
His words were echoed by other fans, who believed that Fu Hao's scoring ability played a crucial role in the team.
In addition, Fu Hao is also excellent in rebounding, and he is often able to grab key rebounds in the game to win a second chance for the team.
In the face of the pressure of the game, Fu Hao showed optimism and tenacity that are rare among players of his age.
Some fans commented: Fu Hao never flinched in the game, no matter how difficult it was, he was able to maintain an optimistic attitude, and this spirit was the key to his success on the court.
Some people believe that although Fu Hao has excellent basketball talent, his performance at critical moments needs to be improved.
At times he was a little weak and lacked a certain amount of decisiveness in the face of opponents' defenses.
Another netizen said: Fu Hao's performance is indeed worthy of recognition, but he still needs more game experience and maturity to really become the leader of the team.
This praise for Fu Hao's character was unanimously echoed by other fans, who all agreed that Fu Hao's optimism and tenacity were the secret to his invincibility on the court.
However, as there has been more and more discussion about the MVP selection mechanism, some fans have begun to question whether the existing selection criteria still apply.
One fan said that there are indeed some problems with the CBA's MVP selection mechanism, and that a reform may be needed to re-examine its fairness.
This call has attracted some attention and forced CBA officials to reconsider how to adjust the selection mechanism to ensure that the MVP is selected fairly and impartially.
If you have any ideas, please leave a message in the comment area below.
If there are problems in the article, please point them out, and the editor will try to correct them.
Note: It is not easy to be original, and plagiarism and manuscript washing must be held responsible. The picture comes from the Internet, and the infringement is deleted.