"There is nothing that can't be solved by a hot pot", which is being screened on May 1st, is a crime comedy, in which there are five typical extrajudicial fanatics in Luo Xiang's mouth, and all kinds of difficult cases committed are complex and quite "punishable"!
The plot of the film involves many criminal law knowledge points such as corruption and bribery, bribery, theft, robbery, harboring, and legitimate defense, which is a must-see for law lovers!
1. Jiu Cake Yu Qian almost committed the crime of "bribery"
Before the "crime of embezzlement and bribery", there must be the crime of "bribery".
Yu Qian's Jiu Cake was afraid that his family's theater would be demolished, so he bribed Director Fu with 200,000 yuan, which logically constituted the crime of bribery.
Interestingly, this is reversed.
Later, it was discovered that in fact, the theater building was a protected building and would not be demolished at all. But the funny thing is that Jiu Bi actually deceived Director Fu, and the gold watch he gave was not genuine, but a worthless parallel import.
So the question arises: does sending worthless parallel goods also constitute the crime of "bribery"?
From the point of view of motive, the purpose of the bribery crime requires the bribe giver to "pursue improper interests", but in fact, the house of nine cakes will not be demolished at all, so his so-called improper interests are no longer established.
Judging from the results, the table he sent was not worth anything at all, and it did not reach the minimum sentencing amount of 30,000 yuan for bribes, so in fact, Jiu Cake was dangerously on the edge of the crime of bribery and made a false alarm.
2. Can Director Fu constitute the crime of "corruption and bribery"?
Director Fu of the Demolition and Relocation Office in the movie is a typical petty official and big greed, Friends who like Mr. Luo Xiang and pay attention to the knowledge of criminal law know that "corruption and bribery" has always been the focus of Mr. Luo's lectures, and it is also closely related to our lives.
Let's go back to the plot of the movie, first of all, Director Fu sought benefits by agreeing to the conditions of helping Jiu Cake with his errands, which has already committed the crime of accepting bribes.
Yes, although he accepted the money of nine cakes but did not do anything, but Mr. Luo Xiang said in class that this kind of behavior cannot be tolerated, "as long as there is a promise, it can constitute bribery", everyone will know this question!
However, this incident in the movie is more special, because the house of nine cakes was later judged to be a historical building that did not need to be demolished, and Director Fu deliberately deceived him, so Director Fu here did not commit the crime of accepting bribes, but turned into the crime of fraud.
But in the end, the watch he defrauded was a cheap fake watch, which did not meet the minimum amount standard for fraud, the current standard in Sichuan and Chongqing is 3,000 yuan, and the watch in the movie is only worth a few hundred yuan. Therefore, Director Fu does not constitute the crime of fraud, but fraud, and according to the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law", he can be administratively detained for up to 15 days.
And he drugged the chicken, which is so hateful, if he really succeeds, he should be punished as rape, and in the end, the medicine was transferred, and he also attempted rape.
3. The protagonist group's "theft" becomes "robbery"
In the film, Yu Qian, Yang Mi and other four people plotted to go to the house of Director Fu (played by Tian Yu) of the Demolition and Relocation Office to steal the stolen money he had received from bribes over the years, and finally moved back a large box of gold and silver treasures as he wished.
Although Director Fu's money is ill-gotten gains, the four protagonists still constitute the crime of theft, even if they finally decide to return the money to its original place, it has already constituted the fact of embezzlement of other people's property, and it cannot be regarded as an attempt to commit a crime.
Moreover, if the money has moved out of Director Fu's house and moved back, it cannot be regarded as the termination of the crime, so the theft of the four people is a definite fact.
There is another question, that is, the protagonist group later brought Director Fu back home by mistake, does it constitute the crime of kidnapping?
The answer is no, because they are not asking for property from themselves or their families through kidnapping.
But this act can turn their theft into robbery. The penalty for robbery is heavier than for theft, because the amount of money involved in the protagonist group is huge, so it is likely to face nearly 10 years in prison (emphasis added).
It should also be emphasized here that even if Director Fu's money is illegally obtained, they also constitute the crime of "robbery", just like Mr. Luo Xiang said in class, even if it is a prohibited item such as drugs, it also constitutes a "crime of robbery", everyone must not take chances......
In addition to this common crime, each of the leading actors is also burdened with their own crimes.
Fourth, Yang Mi is "legitimate defense"
Also almost constituted a crime is the chicken played by Yang Mi.
In the movie, she took advantage of Director Fu's inattention to exchange the ecstasy wine that Director Fu prepared for her, but this glass of wine almost killed Director Fu.
So does this act of the chicken count as intentional homicide or manslaughter?
If it was a few years earlier, it would have been possible to convict her of manslaughter, but after the "Kunshan Longge Anti-Homicide Case", the justifiable defense clause has been paid enough attention, and the law's consideration of such cases will be more humane and comprehensive.
Mi Ji's behavior is an act of self-protection when she knows that Director Fu has drugged herself, so she will be judged to be justified in self-defense.
5. The brother-in-law's wealth constitutes the "crime of harboring"
In the movie, Director Fu accidentally hit a pedestrian and seriously injured him because of drunk driving 3 years ago.
But for the sake of his own great future, he decided to let himself achieve nothing but gambling, and repeatedly asked his brother-in-law for money to take the blame for himself. In the end, the brother-in-law made a fortune and lied that he drove the car and was imprisoned for 3 years.
There is no doubt that the top crime of making a fortune has already committed the crime of harboring, and this crime should be sentenced to up to 3 years in prison.
6. 70,000 Li Jiuxiao will be "punished by public security"
Li Jiuxiao's 70,000 yuan, in the end, because of his emotion, cut Fa Cai's arm with a knife, some people may think that this has constituted the crime of intentional injury, but in fact, it is not, because Fa Cai only suffered a little injury to his arm, which is not enough to meet the definition of minor injury in the penalty.
But this does not mean that Li Jiuxiao is completely fine, he still has to face public security punishment, but he will not go to jail, and may be detained + fined.
After careful interpretation, you will find that there is really a lot of legal knowledge involved in the things that "No Hot Pot" can't solve, and many of them are cases closely related to our daily life.
This is also the interesting thing about this movie, it is completely out of common sense, and the plot is constantly reversed and reversed, which gives the audience a great surprise.
Whether you are interested in legal knowledge or like unexpected stories, don't miss this "There is nothing that can't be solved by a hot pot"!